2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0950-3293(02)00077-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Labeled scales (e.g., category, Likert, VAS) and invalid across-group comparisons: what we have learned from genetic variation in taste

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
148
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 245 publications
(151 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
1
148
1
Order By: Relevance
“…There were no significant differences in fruit and vegetable ratings or fruit and vegetable intake in subjects categorised either by PROP rating or by PROP group. This finding was in disagreement with previous studies, but may have been related to: low subject numbers in the study; the fact that subjects were rated by taste and not by genotype; subjects rating the taste of PROP on a narrow 1-10 scale that may have masked differences that would be seen using the wider 'general labelled magnitude scale' (4) . The results presented here are from the pilot of a larger on-going study aiming to examine the eating habits and reasons for food choice in Irish children and their parents.…”
contrasting
confidence: 91%
“…There were no significant differences in fruit and vegetable ratings or fruit and vegetable intake in subjects categorised either by PROP rating or by PROP group. This finding was in disagreement with previous studies, but may have been related to: low subject numbers in the study; the fact that subjects were rated by taste and not by genotype; subjects rating the taste of PROP on a narrow 1-10 scale that may have masked differences that would be seen using the wider 'general labelled magnitude scale' (4) . The results presented here are from the pilot of a larger on-going study aiming to examine the eating habits and reasons for food choice in Irish children and their parents.…”
contrasting
confidence: 91%
“…In behavioural studies, this can be assessed by measuring a subjects' sensitivity to a bitter chemical called 6-n-propylthiouracil (PROP). Subjects are asked to taste a filter paper soaked in super saturated PROP solution and rate for bitterness intensity on a Generalised Labelled Magnitude Scale (50) . Non-tasters cannot taste the bitterness of PROP (about 25 % of the population), medium tasters (about 50 %) sense the bitterness while accepting it and super-tasters (about 25 %) find the taste of PROP unacceptable.…”
Section: Phenotype and Its Modulation Of Functional Mri Responsesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the first session subjects were familiarized with the general Labeled Magnitude Scale 34 for rating sensation intensity and the Labeled Hedonic Scale 35,36 for rating flavor liking/disliking. The general version of the LMS is a category ratio scale of perceived sensation intensity with seven semantic labels: "no sensation," "barely detectable," "weak," "moderate," "strong," "very strong," and "strongest imaginable sensation of any kind."…”
Section: Training Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%