2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0969-8051(00)00149-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Labeling and distribution of linear peptides identified using in vivo phage display selection for tumors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, coupling of chelators has been shown to result in appreciable loss of target-binding capacity of linear phage display selected peptides. 45 In our case, all anti-EGFR Affibody molecules preserved the capacity to bind to EGFR-expressing cell lines after chelate coupling and radiolabeling. Most likely, the robust scaffold of Affibody molecules prevented any undesirable conformational change.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…For example, coupling of chelators has been shown to result in appreciable loss of target-binding capacity of linear phage display selected peptides. 45 In our case, all anti-EGFR Affibody molecules preserved the capacity to bind to EGFR-expressing cell lines after chelate coupling and radiolabeling. Most likely, the robust scaffold of Affibody molecules prevented any undesirable conformational change.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…In fact, this ErbB-2 tumor -targeting peptide is one of the first phage displayselected peptides other than the vasculature-targeting peptides (42) that have been used successfully in tumor imaging in vivo. In 2000, a report concluded that peptides isolated from phage display do not bind with high retention to tumors in vivo (43). Since then, a few studies have reported sequences from phage libraries that target neuroblastomas and prostate tumors in vivo; however, in these cases, the target antigens remain unknown (44,45).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In some cases, the conjugation of a chelator induced a strong change of the secondary structure and resulted in a conjugate with improved the characteristics (higher binding affinity and better stability to peptidases) in comparison with its non-conjugated counterpart [81]. However, the attachment of prosthetic groups, linkers and chelators can have an adverse influence on the binding of short peptides to molecular targets [83].…”
Section: Peptides As Imaging Agentsmentioning
confidence: 99%