2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114646
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Labeling, causal attributions, and social network ties to people with mental illness

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, our findings show that familiarity with disability issues, as measured by reported relationships with someone who has a disability (or having one oneself), is associated with support for policy. This is consistent with multiple previous studies which show that contact with people with various disabilities is associated with more positive attitudes compared to respondents without contact (Burke et al, 2013;Ju et al, 2013;Pullen et al, 2022). The mechanism that underlies this association, however, is unclear.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…For example, our findings show that familiarity with disability issues, as measured by reported relationships with someone who has a disability (or having one oneself), is associated with support for policy. This is consistent with multiple previous studies which show that contact with people with various disabilities is associated with more positive attitudes compared to respondents without contact (Burke et al, 2013;Ju et al, 2013;Pullen et al, 2022). The mechanism that underlies this association, however, is unclear.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…In essence, if one has more negative experiences with someone who has a substance use problem, this could galvanize stigmatizing beliefs such that high amounts of positive contact would be needed to supplant the negative associations made from prior contact. Future research will benefit from a more nuanced measure of contact (e.g., Pullen et al, 2022; Railey et al, 2023) that better accounts for heterogeneity inherent in interpersonal contact.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In essence, contact aims to lessen stigma-enhancing effects of emotion-based drivers of stigma such as fear or anger (e.g., Dijker & Koomen, 2003; Röhm et al, 2022) that are crucially tied to personal attributions (e.g., Weiner, 1980; for a review, see Krendl & Perry, in press). As a corollary, emerging evidence shows that contact with close family members who have a mental health condition drives down the likelihood that someone will endorse stigma altogether (Pullen et al, 2022). In fact, the authors also showed that contact reduced the likelihood that people endorse bad character as the root cause of mental health conditions.…”
Section: Knowing More? the Role Of Causal Attributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some forms of social contact may be particularly beneficial; recent research has suggested that the presence of close ties with valued contacts (Pullen et al, 2022 ), e.g., friends, characterised by positive experiences (Felix & Lynn, 2022 ) are associated with lower levels of stigma. Social contact is expected to help disconfirm negative stereotypes (Pullen et al, 2022 ), but this may depend on the nature of that contact. Manago and Krendl ( 2022 ) observe that it can be difficult to create social contact outside of controlled research settings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%