2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2003.10.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Labeling of fusion proteins of O6-alkylguanine-DNA alkyltransferase with small molecules in vivo and in vitro

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
151
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 185 publications
(152 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
151
0
Order By: Relevance
“…SNAP is derived from alkyl guanine DNA alkyl transferase, a DNA repair enzyme that irreversibly transfers an alkyl group from its substrate to a reactive cysteine residue (32)(33)(34)(35)(36). The availability of cell-permeable nonfluorescent and fluorescent SNAP substrates, such as TMR-Star, allows for a broad variety of applications.…”
Section: Significancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…SNAP is derived from alkyl guanine DNA alkyl transferase, a DNA repair enzyme that irreversibly transfers an alkyl group from its substrate to a reactive cysteine residue (32)(33)(34)(35)(36). The availability of cell-permeable nonfluorescent and fluorescent SNAP substrates, such as TMR-Star, allows for a broad variety of applications.…”
Section: Significancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 A). The SNAP tag, a modified form of the enzyme O 6 -alkylguanine-DNA alkyltransferase, allows temporally and spatially defined cohorts of proteins to be selectively labeled and detected (Juillerat et al, 2003;Keppler et al, 2004). The tag binds covalently to O 6 -benzylguanine (BG), resulting in the irreversible transfer of the substituted benzyl group to the reactive thiol within the SNAP tag.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For additional confirmation, we generated stably transformed S2R+ cells expressing SNAPf-tagged Cid. This particular Cid variant can be fluorescently labeled by addition of TMR-Star, a tetramethylRhodamine derivative, to the culture medium (Keppler et al, 2004). Quantification after labeling with such a low molecular weight compound appeared preferable to anti-Cid immunolabeling where complications with variable epitope accessibility during different cell cycle stages were encountered.…”
Section: The Total Amount Of Centromeric Cid Increases During G1mentioning
confidence: 99%