1976
DOI: 10.1007/bf00292946
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Labelling of DNA and differential sister chromatid staining after BrdU treatment in vivo

Abstract: A method of labelling DNA in vivo with 5-bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) is described. After 6 h permanent subcutaneous infusion of BrdU in rodents (adult Microtus agrestis, pregnant NMRI-mice), cell nuclei which have undergone DNA synthesis during the BrdU treatment can be differentiated from the nuclei of other cycle stages by means of their altered staining behaviour after Giemsa. 24 h after the BrdU treatment, mitoses from both bone marrow of the adult animals and tissues from the fetuses showed a differential si… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1977
1977
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Cell tracking has been a focus of active research in regenerative engineering. , Enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP) reporter gene, , luciferase reporter gene, and 5-bromodeoxyuridine , are often used to image engineered cells. The luciferase and EGFP reporter genes, which have been used extensively in tumor cells, are rarely employed in implantology.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cell tracking has been a focus of active research in regenerative engineering. , Enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP) reporter gene, , luciferase reporter gene, and 5-bromodeoxyuridine , are often used to image engineered cells. The luciferase and EGFP reporter genes, which have been used extensively in tumor cells, are rarely employed in implantology.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Differential staining of sister chromatids based on the incorporation of 5-bromodeoxyuridine (BrdUrd) into DNA [Goto et al, 1975;Ikushima and Wolff, 1974;Korenberg and Freedlender, 1974; Latt, 1973;Perry and Wolff, 1974;Scheres et al, 19771 has permitted the development of various systems for detecting and analyzing the effect of physical and chemical mutagens on the induction of sister chromatid exchanges (SCEs) in vivo [Allen and Latt, 1976;Allen et al, 1977;Bloom and Hsu, 1975;Comer et al, 1978;Kanda and Kato, 1979;Kligerman and Bloom, 1976;Morales-Ramirez, 1980;Pera and Mattias, 1976;Schneider et al, 1976;Vogel and Bauknecht, 19761, as well as in vitro [Guerrero et al, 1979;Latt, 1974;Perry and Evans, 1975;Raffetto et al, 1979;Stetka and Wolff, 19761. These systems are quite sensitive to chemical mutagens [Abe and Sasaki, 1977;Nakanishi and Schneider, 1979;Perry and Evans, 1975;Popescu et al, 19771 and ultraviolet (UV) light [MacRae et al, 1979;Popescu et al, 19791 but contradictory data have been obtained with ionizing radiation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two hours later, the cells were collected in order to accumulate metaphases. Cells were treated as described by Pera and Mattias (1976) to allow recognition of SCE between differentially stained chromatids. For each subject, 4 tubes were used and 30 intact metaphases were analyzed.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%