2006
DOI: 10.1080/13642980600976369
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Labia Elongation under African Customary Law: A Violation of Women's Rights?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One interesting implication of the Bhe Case is that African customary law is a distinction that, although it is not often clearly made in either legislation or judicial practice, can involve the distinction between the rules that prescribe who marries whom, and the non-discriminatory forms and conditions involving fundamental policies of equality of access and liberty to choose (Mwenda 2008). The validity test of African customary law, as described in the legislative frameworks of many Commonwealth African States, is that ‘a custom is only valid if it does not offend public policy, or any laws of a concerned country, or natural justice, good conscience and equity’ (Kaoma Mwenda, 2006: 341). This concept of validity, although it defines the nexus between African customary law and other laws of the country, it does not clearly define what in fact is a custom.…”
Section: The Rhetorical Tradition and African ‘Maat’mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One interesting implication of the Bhe Case is that African customary law is a distinction that, although it is not often clearly made in either legislation or judicial practice, can involve the distinction between the rules that prescribe who marries whom, and the non-discriminatory forms and conditions involving fundamental policies of equality of access and liberty to choose (Mwenda 2008). The validity test of African customary law, as described in the legislative frameworks of many Commonwealth African States, is that ‘a custom is only valid if it does not offend public policy, or any laws of a concerned country, or natural justice, good conscience and equity’ (Kaoma Mwenda, 2006: 341). This concept of validity, although it defines the nexus between African customary law and other laws of the country, it does not clearly define what in fact is a custom.…”
Section: The Rhetorical Tradition and African ‘Maat’mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LME has been documented as a common practice along a crescent moonshaped corridor that covers most of East and Southern Africa (Bagnol & Mariano, 2012;Grassivaro Gallo & Catania, 2015;Mwenda, 2006;Pétursdóttir, 2010;Tamale, 2006). To some girls, LME is one of the first instructions they receive in a socialisation process that in many cases concludes with their attendance at initiation rituals into womanhood in which other instructions on personal hygiene, respect for elders and traditional ceremonies, and sexual techniques are provided (Pétursdóttir, 2010;Tamale, 2006;Martin Hilber et al, 2012;Rasing, 2001).…”
Section: Géneros -Multidisciplinary Journal Of Gender Studies 5(2) 988mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LME is practiced in Zambia (Dauphin-Tinturier, 2008;Mwenda, 2006;Rasing, 2001;Spring, 1973). In South Africa, LME is documented as having been practised by some women in the north-eastern provinces (Krige & Krige, 1980;Manabe, 2010;Milubi, 2000).…”
Section: Géneros -Multidisciplinary Journal Of Gender Studies 5(2) 988mentioning
confidence: 99%