2021
DOI: 10.1039/d1ew00446h
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Labile carbon release from oxic–anoxic cycling in woodchip bioreactors enhances nitrate removal without increasing nitrous oxide accumulation

Abstract: Denitrification in woodchip bioreactors (WBRs) treating agricultural drainage and runoff is frequently carbon-limited due to the recalcitrance of carbon (C) in lignocellulosic woodchip biomass. Recent research has shown that redox...

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The N 2 O yield also varied considerably, initially increasing as the reactor transitioned to hypoxic conditions, and then decreasing and stabilizing once the system became anoxic. NH 4 + concentrations in the reactor pore water were negligible, suggesting that DNRA was not a major process in this system (McGuire et al, 2021).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The N 2 O yield also varied considerably, initially increasing as the reactor transitioned to hypoxic conditions, and then decreasing and stabilizing once the system became anoxic. NH 4 + concentrations in the reactor pore water were negligible, suggesting that DNRA was not a major process in this system (McGuire et al, 2021).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…There were no systematic changes in denitrification gene abundances between the beginning and end of experiments, or between CS and DRW reactors. Wet chemical and dissolved gas measurements reported in McGuire et al (McGuire et al, 2021) showed that the DRW reactor had significantly faster NO 3 − removal rates than the CS reactor. In replicate 1, DRW conditions also led to a decrease in the effective N 2 O yield from 8.1 × 10 −3 ± 2.1 × 10 −3 mg N 2 ON/mg NO 3 − ‐ N in the CS reactor to 1.4 × 10 −4 ± 6.4 × 10 −4 mg N 2 O−N/mg NO 3 − −N in the DRW reactor.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Efforts have been made to optimize process performance and bioreactor design, by considering reactor hydrology (Hoover et al, 2016;Martin et al, 2019;Nordström and Herbert, 2017;Schaefer et al, 2021), substrates for the denitrifying microorganisms (Cameron and Schipper, 2010;Hellman et al, 2021;McGuire et al, 2021;Wang and Chu, 2016) and choice of inoculum (Lefèvre et al, 2013). However, it is not until recently interest has been drawn to the microbial communities in the bioreactors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%