2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jormas.2020.10.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Labiomental sensation after segmental mandibulectomy and inferior alveolar nerve preservation for osteoradionecrosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
4
0
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
4
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The post-surgical sequelae of mandibular resection are relevant because they severely affect the quality of life of patients ( 10 ). Preservation of the IAN in maxillofacial surgical procedures where surgical resection of the mandibular bone has been performed is an alternative that has shown successful outcomes in terms of a reduction in postoperative sequelae ( 4 , 10 , 13 ), and is currently positioned as a necessary and feasible procedure ( 10 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The post-surgical sequelae of mandibular resection are relevant because they severely affect the quality of life of patients ( 10 ). Preservation of the IAN in maxillofacial surgical procedures where surgical resection of the mandibular bone has been performed is an alternative that has shown successful outcomes in terms of a reduction in postoperative sequelae ( 4 , 10 , 13 ), and is currently positioned as a necessary and feasible procedure ( 10 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20 Several attempts have long been reported to preserve IAN while performing mandibulectomy; however, such approach is limited to benign lesions, where clear margins can be achieved, meanwhile preserving IAN. [21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28] Unfortunately, this is not appropriate for malignant tumors or aggressive benign lesions that necessitate sacrifice of IAN for tumor free margins. Moreover, some scholars do not recommend IAN preservation as being conservative and sparing IAN in some tumors is detrimental.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the great improvements of various techniques of mandible reconstruction following oncologic resection; however, still there would be little consideration to repair IAN and preserve lower lip sensations 20 . Several attempts have long been reported to preserve IAN while performing mandibulectomy; however, such approach is limited to benign lesions, where clear margins can be achieved, meanwhile preserving IAN 21–28 . Unfortunately, this is not appropriate for malignant tumors or aggressive benign lesions that necessitate sacrifice of IAN for tumor free margins.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…segmental dapat menurunkan kualitas hidup pasien yang disebabkan oleh asimetri wajah, serta kelainan pada mandibula yang dapat menyebabkan disfungsi pada pengunyahan dan artikulasi. 11,24,25,26 Upaya meminimalkan efek terapi, rekonstruksi perlu dilakukan untuk menjaga kualitas hidup pasien. 9,10,11 .…”
Section: Mandibulektomiunclassified
“…Cangkok autogenous dapat digunakan sebagai cangkok tulang non-vaskularisasi atau vaskularisasi untuk kontinuitas mekanis dan efisiensi defek tulang yang dihasilkan dari reseksi tumor. Fibula merupakan pilihan terbaik karena karakteristik tulang yang panjang dan berbentuk tabung dengan kekuatan yang baik untuk menjaga kelangsungan gaya lengkung rahang dan pengunyahan 16,24,25,26 Fibula juga dianggap sebagai cangkok tulang autogenous terkuat yang tersedia jika dibandingkan dengan situs donor autograft kortikal lainnya seperti krista iliaka dan poros tibialis anterior. 11,27,28 Cangkok tulang non-vaskularisasi memiliki kelebihan antara lain waktu operasi dan periode rawat inap yang dapat dipersingkat dibandingkan dengan flap tulang vaskularisasi.…”
Section: Mandibulektomiunclassified