Labor Market Adjustment: is Russia Different?

Abstract

Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. Terms of use: Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your personal and scholarly purposes.You are not to copy documents for public or commercial purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. licence. www.econstor.eu Any opinions expressed here are those of the author(s) and not those of IZA. Research published in this series may include views on policy, but the institute itself takes no institutional policy positions. If the documents have been made available under an Open Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you may exercise further usage rights as specified in the indicated D I S C U S S I O N P A P E R S E R I E SThe Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA) in Bonn is a local and virtual international research center and a place of communication between science, politics and business. IZA is an independent nonprofit organization supported by Deutsche Post Foundation. The center is associated with the University of Bonn and offers a stimulating research environment through its international network, workshops and conferences, data service, project support, research visits and doctoral program. IZA engages in (i) original and internationally competitive research in all fields of labor economics, (ii) development of policy concepts, and (iii) dissemination of research results and concepts to the interested public.IZA Discussion Papers often represent preliminary work and are circulated to encourage discussion. Citation of such a paper should account for its provisional character. A revised version may be available directly from the author.IZA Discussion Paper No. 5588 March 2011 ABSTRACT Labor Market Adjustment: Is Russia Different?The paper discusses how the Russian labor market has been evolving over two decades of the transition. It starts with tracing key labor market indicators such as employment, unemployment, labor force participation, working hours, and real wages. Their dynamics indicate that the labor market tends to operate in a non-conventional fashion and far from the patterns expected initially. The authors argue that the current Russian labor market represents a peculiar model that is different from what is observed in the rest of Europe outside of the CIS. Having established this, they look at the institutional foundations that make this unconventional performance possible and proceed with discussing pol...

Recomposition and levelling of consumption expenditures across four economic shocks in Russia, 1994–2014

“…Social safety nets did not contribute significantly to reducing inequality, given that the system of social protection is inadequate to protect the poor and suffers from serious leakage effects (Lokshin & Ravallion, ). Unemployment assistance was also very far from what was needed to reduce inequality (Gimpelson & Kapeliushnikov, ). Nor did the existence of stable pension benefits lead to a levelling effect.…”

Measuring Individual Material Well-Being Using Multidimensional Indices: An Application Using the Gender and Generation Survey for Russia

“…The research on Russia, in particular, often has to deal with income underreporting and volatility (Ovcharova and Tesliuk 2006;Gorodnichenko, Sabirianova Peter et al 2010;Gimpelson and Kapeliushnikov 2011;Popova 2013 …”

A prospective analysis of labour market status and self‐rated health in the UK and Russia

“…The eligibility rules to receive unemployment benefit in 2004 were that individuals must have registered at an unemployment office, have had 26 weeks of full‐time employment in the last 12 months (or the 26‐week equivalent for part‐time work), and be able and willing to work (International Social Security Association, ). Between 1999 and 2008, the proportion of the average monthly wage provided by the average monthly unemployment benefit dropped from 25.5 to 7.4 percent (Gimpelson and Kapeliushnikov, ). The minimum level of unemployment benefits, provided to 48.1 percent of unemployment beneficiaries in 1999, amounted to only 5.3 percent of the average wage, and only 8.3 percent of the subsistence minimum (Tchetvernina et al ., ).…”

“…After a maximum period of 2 years, individuals were no longer eligible for unemployment benefit and received social assistance (Tchetvernina et al ., ). The low level of benefit provided has discouraged individuals from signing on; the difference between claimant (registered) unemployment and the level of unemployment measured according to the International Labour Organization definition has varied from seven‐fold to just under three‐fold during the 2000s (Gimpelson and Kapeliushnikov, ).…”