Labor Standards in Trade Preference Laws Between the US and Africa

Frankowski, Paweł

doi:10.1057/978-1-137-58984-2_6

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…By contrast, the practice of implementing and enforcing special procedures remains a largely neglected field of inquiry. A handful of recent publications tackle procedural issues, including: compliance with labour and environmental standards (Frankowski, 2016; Orbie et al ., 2017; Portela, 2018; Harrison et al ., 2019); rules of origin (Porto, 2020); dispute settlement (Marx et al ., 2017; Schill, 2017; de Nanteuil, 2019; Dolle and Medina, 2020); and parliamentary oversight of the implementation of agreements (Jančić, 2017; Weiß, 2018; Kerremans et al ., 2019).…”

Section: Jifs and Eu Bilateral Agreements: An Emerging Research Agendamentioning

confidence: 99%

Joint Institutional Frameworks in EU Bilateral Agreements: Joint Bodies, Rules and Principles, and Special Procedures

Tyushka

Phinnemore

Weiß

2022

J of Common Market Studies

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This introductory article makes the case for studying joint institutional frameworks (JIFs) in EU bilateral agreements and provides an overview of the remaining contributions to the symposium. In doing so, it addresses contemporary policy developments and theoretical debates in political science and international institutional law. It considers the rationale, design, performance as well as legitimacy of JIFs both in general and, in particular, in the EU's contractual bilateral relations. By mapping out the variety of JIFs in distinct geographical and regulatory contexts, the article develops an overarching argument about the 'transversal' nature of such structural frameworks, focusing on the most prevalent structural principles and rules, joint bodies and special procedures, including those not covered in detail in the other contributions to this symposium.

show abstract