Laboratory and feral hybridization ofAteles geoffroyi panamensis Kellogg and Goldman 1944 andA. fusciceps robustus Allen 1914 in Panama

Rossan, Richard N.; Baerg, David C.

doi:10.1007/bf02382962

Cited by 14 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 2 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Re cent studies indicate that there may be some 1 -2 chromosome sig nificant differences among the species recognized by Kellogg and Goldman (Heltne and Kunkel, 1975). Furthermore, an important con tact zone between A. geoffroyi and A. iusciceps exists in eastern Panama and the species apparently hybridizes to some extent (Rossan and Baerg, 1977). Until further information becomes available, I prefer to follow Kellogg and Goldman (1944) and use the name Ate ies paniscus in the strict sense.…”

Section: Taxonomy and Distribution Of Ateiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Habitat preferences, diet, feeding strategy and social organization of the black spider monkey [Ateles paniscus paniscus Linnaeus 1758] in Surinam

Roosmalen¹

1985

Acta Amaz.

224

148

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

(back cover) HABITAT PREFERENCES, DIET, FEEDING BEHAVIOR AND SOCIAL ORGANIZATION OF THE BLACK SPIDER MON KEY, ATELES PANISCUS PANISCUS, IN SURINAM.A Socioecological Field Study.This monograph reports on a 26 month socioecological study of black spider monkeys (Ateies paniscus paniscus) in the Raleighvallen -Voltzberg Nature Reserve, Surinam. It recognizes the .fun damental importance of food to the behavior and the regulation of population density fox this primate. It clarifies the complex tempo ral and spatial effects of tropical rain forest food sources on the be havior of a group of spider monkeys, concentrating on food category, food plant identity and phenology, and quantity, density and dis persion of the most important food sources. In addition, the present study describes habitat choice, optimal feeding strategy and sexual behavior of the spider monkey, and discusses implications of diet for social behavior. This study is also fundamental to conservation. Specialized in eating mature fruits, the spider monkey is a very im portant dispersal agent for many trees and lianes, particularly ca nopy species. However, the spider monkey is probably the most vulnerable monkey species in Surinam and it is disappearing ra pidly throughout the remainder of its range. Unfortunately, it is lar ge and noisy and can be easily tracked and hunted. It is largely restricted to undisturbed high forest, and consequently habitat des truction has more effect on it than on most other species. Together with its slow reproductive rate (a female gives birth only once every four or five years), this means that the species is poorly adapted to recover from exploitation. In order to implement proper measu res for conservation, data on forest type preferences, diet and so cial behavior of the species, or on closely related species, in undisturbed areas, such as the one described in this monograph, are essential tools for assessing the potential of proposed protected areas.

show abstract

Section: Taxonomy and Distribution Of Ateiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Habitat preferences, diet, feeding strategy and social organization of the black spider monkey [Ateles paniscus paniscus Linnaeus 1758] in Surinam

Roosmalen¹

1985

Acta Amaz.

224

148

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In strepsirrhines, hybridization has been reported among subspecies and species of lemurs, and especially taxa within the genus Eulemur (Curtis and Zaramody, 1998; Wyner et al, 2002; Pastorini et al, 2009). In platyrrhines, hybridization has been observed among howler monkeys (genus Alouatta ; Gregorin, 2006; Aguiar et al, 2007, 2008; Kelaita and Cortes-Ortiz, 2009; Cortés-Ortiz et al, 2015), spider monkeys (genus Ateles ; Rossan and Baerg, 1977), saddle-back tamarin ( Saguinus fuscicollis ) subspecies (Cheverud et al, 1993; Peres et al, 1996; Kohn et al, 2001), and among different species of marmoset (Coimbra-Filho et al, 1993; Tagliaro et al, 1997; Marroig et al, 2004; Malukiewicz, 2013; Fuzessy et al, 2014; Malukiewicz et al, 2014). Within Old World Monkeys, baboons (genus Papio ), macaques (genus Macaca ), and guenon species (genus Cercopithecus ) exhibit inter- and intra-specific hybridization (Fooden, 1964; Bergman and Beehner, 2004; Wildman et al, 2004; Detwiler et al, 2005; Schillaci et al, 2005; Zinner et al, 2009).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Craniomandibular form and body size variation of first generation mouse hybrids: A model for hominin hybridization

Warren

Ritzman

Humphreys

et al. 2018

Journal of Human Evolution

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Hybridization occurs in a number of mammalian lineages, including among primate taxa. Analyses of ancient genomes have shown that hybridization between our lineage and other archaic hominins in Eurasia occurred numerous times in the past. However, we still have limited empirical data on what a hybrid skeleton looks like, or how to spot patterns of hybridization among fossils for which there are no genetic data. Here we use experimental mouse models to supplement previous studies of primates. We characterize size and shape variation in the cranium and mandible of three wild-derived inbred mouse strains and their first generation (F) hybrids. The three parent taxa in our analysis represent lineages that diverged over approximately the same period as the human/Neanderthal/Denisovan lineages and their hybrids are variably successful in the wild. Comparisons of body size, as quantified by long bone measurements, are also presented to determine whether the identified phenotypic effects of hybridization are localized to the cranium or represent overall body size changes. The results indicate that hybrid cranial and mandibular sizes, as well as limb length, exceed that of the parent taxa in all cases. All three F hybrid crosses display similar patterns of size and form variation. These results are generally consistent with earlier studies on primates and other mammals, suggesting that the effects of hybridization may be similar across very different scenarios of hybridization, including different levels of hybrid fitness. This paper serves to supplement previous studies aimed at identifying F hybrids in the fossil record and to introduce further research that will explore hybrid morphologies using mice as a proxy for better understanding hybridization in the hominin fossil record.

show abstract

“…Many hybrid zones have been documented and studied in primates, including cercopithecines (baboons [Phillips-Conroy & Jolly, 1986;Nagel, 1973]; guenons [Struhsaker et al, 1988]; Sulawesi macaques [Bynum et al, 1997;Froehlich & Supriatna, 1996], gibbons [Brockelman & Gittins, 1984], and New World monkeys (spider monkeys [Rossan & Baerg, 1977]; capuchins [Torres de Caballero et al, 1976]; and saddleback tamarins [Cheverud et al, 1993;Peres et al, 1996]). In Madagascar, hybrid zones have been observed between black lemur subspecies [Meyers et al, 1989] and among brown lemur taxa [Lehman & Wright, 2000;Sterling & Ramarason, 1996].…”

Section: Introduction Hybrid Zonesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Genetic assessment of a white‐collared×red‐fronted lemur hybrid zone at Andringitra, Madagascar

Wyner

Johnson

Stumpf

et al. 2002

American J Primatol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

We examined a purported lemur (Eulemur fulvus rufusxE. albocollaris) hybrid zone at Andringitra, Madagascar, using sequences from five genes (one mitochondrial gene (d-loop) and four nuclear introns (hemopexin, malic enzyme, ceruloplasmin, and microsatellite 26 flanking region)), from 60 individuals (E. albocollaris (n = 16), E.f. rufus (n = 14), E. collaris (n = 9), and purported hybrids from Andringitra (n = 21)). Diagnostic (d-loop and microsatellite 26) and private sites (all other genes) were found in all gene regions for E. albocollaris and E.f. rufus. Also, private sites were found for the purported hybrid population in two gene regions (d-loop and ceruloplasmin). When the putative hybrids were examined for diagnostic and private markers, 18 of 21 were found to contain markers from both E. albocollaris and E.f. rufus populations. The remaining three individuals were found to contain only markers for E. albocollaris. These results indicate that the population at Andringitra is a hybrid population between E. albocollaris and E.f. rufus.

show abstract

Laboratory and feral hybridization ofAteles geoffroyi panamensis Kellogg and Goldman 1944 andA. fusciceps robustus Allen 1914 in Panama

Cited by 14 publications

References 2 publications

Habitat preferences, diet, feeding strategy and social organization of the black spider monkey [Ateles paniscus paniscus Linnaeus 1758] in Surinam

Habitat preferences, diet, feeding strategy and social organization of the black spider monkey [Ateles paniscus paniscus Linnaeus 1758] in Surinam

Craniomandibular form and body size variation of first generation mouse hybrids: A model for hominin hybridization

Genetic assessment of a white‐collared×red‐fronted lemur hybrid zone at Andringitra, Madagascar

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About