2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jspr.2009.07.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Laboratory assessment of insecticidal effectiveness of natural zeolite and diatomaceous earth formulations against three stored-product beetle pests

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
34
0
3

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
3
34
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The results presented in this study conÞrm previous general conclusions that: 1) the species of the genus Sitophilus are more sensitive to DEs than those of Tribolium, especially after short-time exposures (Korunić 1997, Fields and Korunić 2000 and also to natural zeolites (Kljajić et al 2010); 2) the mortality of stored-product insects increases signiÞcantly with increased duration of their exposure to wheat treated with DEs (Fields et al 2003; 3) the total mortality of insects exposed to wheat treated with different inert dusts, including natural zeolites, after recovery, also increases (Arthur 2001;Collins andCook 2006a, 2006b;Kljajić et al 2010); 4) the dose rates used are relatively high, or at least similar to those of the registered DEs; 5) the efÞcacy of DE based inert dusts depends primarily on the silicium dioxide content and particle size distribution, so that the highest efÞcacy is achieved with DE dusts of uniform particle size distribution with a mean particle size of about or below 10 m, higher percentage of particles with diameters below 12 m, and high amorphous SiO 2 content (Korunić 1997(Korunić , 1998; and 6) DE based inert dusts, with amorphous silica structure, are more effective than natural zeolite dusts as crystalline hydrated aluminosilicates (Kljajić et al 2010), where zeolites have some speciÞc disadvantages because of the presence of more crystaline ingredients or smaller particles.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results presented in this study conÞrm previous general conclusions that: 1) the species of the genus Sitophilus are more sensitive to DEs than those of Tribolium, especially after short-time exposures (Korunić 1997, Fields and Korunić 2000 and also to natural zeolites (Kljajić et al 2010); 2) the mortality of stored-product insects increases signiÞcantly with increased duration of their exposure to wheat treated with DEs (Fields et al 2003; 3) the total mortality of insects exposed to wheat treated with different inert dusts, including natural zeolites, after recovery, also increases (Arthur 2001;Collins andCook 2006a, 2006b;Kljajić et al 2010); 4) the dose rates used are relatively high, or at least similar to those of the registered DEs; 5) the efÞcacy of DE based inert dusts depends primarily on the silicium dioxide content and particle size distribution, so that the highest efÞcacy is achieved with DE dusts of uniform particle size distribution with a mean particle size of about or below 10 m, higher percentage of particles with diameters below 12 m, and high amorphous SiO 2 content (Korunić 1997(Korunić , 1998; and 6) DE based inert dusts, with amorphous silica structure, are more effective than natural zeolite dusts as crystalline hydrated aluminosilicates (Kljajić et al 2010), where zeolites have some speciÞc disadvantages because of the presence of more crystaline ingredients or smaller particles.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Haryadi et al (1994) have shown that natural zeolite can be effective in controlling maize weevil Sitophilus zeamais (Motsch), but the rates applied in this study were very high (Ն50 g/kg of maize). Kljajić et al (2010) have also found high effectiveness of natural zeolite originating from Serbia, applied however at much lower rates (0.75 g/kg) and low relative humidity (r.h.) (40 Ð 45% r.h.), against three stored-product beetle pests in treated wheat.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Inert dusts can be mixed with different stored agricultural grains to control stored grain pests and different crawling pests in storages and in different industrial objects for food production. Inert dusts do not deteriorate or break down, and therefore, provide long-term control of insect pests and are almost completely harmless to humans and mammals (Maceljski and Korunic (1972), Fields and Muir (1996), Subramanyam and Roesli (2000), Arthur and Puterka (2002), Kljajić et al (2010) gave detailed guidelines on the key aspects for the use of inert dusts as a possible alternative to synthetic pesticides in stored products, and proposed inert dusts to be included into IPM program.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, it is used to control warehouse pests (Golob 1997;Subramanyam and Roesli 2000;Kljajić et al 2010) to protect plants against insects from different orders (Markó et al 2008;Mikami et al 2010;Muncha-Pelzer et al 2010) and also against various plant diseases (Glenn et al 1999;Glenn and Puterka 2005). It has a physical or deterrent mode of action (Subramanyam and Roesli 2000;Markó et al 2008) which allows its use in organic and IPM programmes according to European IPM directive 2009/128.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%