2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.02.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Laboratory based approaches for arsenic remediation from contaminated water: Recent developments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
251
1
7

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 435 publications
(260 citation statements)
references
References 124 publications
(145 reference statements)
1
251
1
7
Order By: Relevance
“…The peak at the wavelength of 885 and 820 cm -1 are negligible. This represents presence of As(III) in the biomass (Mondal et al 2006). Figure 3a shows the FTIR spectra of RH biomass and there were four or more CH 2 in a row and a rocking absorption was found around wave number of 720 cm -1 .…”
Section: Characterisation Of Biosorbentsmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The peak at the wavelength of 885 and 820 cm -1 are negligible. This represents presence of As(III) in the biomass (Mondal et al 2006). Figure 3a shows the FTIR spectra of RH biomass and there were four or more CH 2 in a row and a rocking absorption was found around wave number of 720 cm -1 .…”
Section: Characterisation Of Biosorbentsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…As it can be seen, the Freundlich isotherm gave better fits than the Langmuir isotherm, which illustrated that the biosorption on the surface of MLP and RH was a multilayer biosorption. Urik et al (2009) and Mondal et al (2006) reported the mechanism of As(III) adsorption onto modified sawdust and granular activated carbon seem to be formation of inner and outer sphere surface complex. Thus, the formation of chemical bond present in the surface of biomass and metal ions.…”
Section: Adsorption Diffusion Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At present, many approaches such as adsorption, ion exchange, reverse osmosis, nanofiltration, coagulation (coprecipitation), membrane distillation, biological methods and photo catalytic oxidation are increasingly being used for the removal of arsenic from water body [2][3][4][5]. Coagulation (co-precipitation) and adsorption processes are most promising for aqueous arsenic removal because of the low cost and high efficiency, and are widely used in the developing world.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some conventional methods have been applied for removing As from contaminated water, but found to be high-cost or lowefficiency (Mondal et al, 2006). Phytoremediation, a plant-based green technology, may provide an alternative and cost-effective method for As removal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%