2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcv.2019.03.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Laboratory diagnosis of congenital CMV infection in newborns: Impact of pre-analytic factors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Summarized, our study confirmed reliable detection of different pathogens by real-time PCR after sample storage and transport on Whatman papers and flocked swabs at ambient temperature in a tropical environment. Such reliable detection has been suggested before for bacteria, protozoa and even RNA viruses in previous assessments (Uttayamakul et al 2005;Rajendram et al 2006;Menassa et al 2010;Jones et al 2012;Petrov et al 2014;Koontz et al 2015;Lalani et al 2015;Randriamparany et al 2016;Silbert et al 2017;Zainabadi et al 2017;Nag et al 2018;Natarajan et al 2018;Kohmer et al 2019;Panda et al 2019;Walker et al 2019). Of note, Cohen's kappa for the comparison of the standard extraction with the assessed alternative nucleic acid extraction approaches ranged from fair (0Á21) to substantial (0Á76) (Table 2).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 60%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Summarized, our study confirmed reliable detection of different pathogens by real-time PCR after sample storage and transport on Whatman papers and flocked swabs at ambient temperature in a tropical environment. Such reliable detection has been suggested before for bacteria, protozoa and even RNA viruses in previous assessments (Uttayamakul et al 2005;Rajendram et al 2006;Menassa et al 2010;Jones et al 2012;Petrov et al 2014;Koontz et al 2015;Lalani et al 2015;Randriamparany et al 2016;Silbert et al 2017;Zainabadi et al 2017;Nag et al 2018;Natarajan et al 2018;Kohmer et al 2019;Panda et al 2019;Walker et al 2019). Of note, Cohen's kappa for the comparison of the standard extraction with the assessed alternative nucleic acid extraction approaches ranged from fair (0Á21) to substantial (0Á76) (Table 2).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 60%
“…However, different types of swabs can stabilize pathogen nucleic acids with varying efficacy, leading to varying degrees of diagnostic reliability, as was shown for gastroenteric pathogens (Silbert et al 2017;Walker et al 2019) and viruses such as African swine fever virus (Petrov et al 2014) or cytomegalovirus (Kohmer et al 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(DOCX) S2 Table. Influence of storage conditions on CMV DNA recovery. The flocked swabs of the eNAT™ kit (Copan Italia, Bresca, Italy; order number: 608CS01R), were immersed in a virus suspension with rotating movements for 4-6 seconds and subsequently transferred into 1 ml of eNAT™ medium or 1 ml virus transport medium (Sigma-Virocult, Medical Wire & Equipment, Corsham, Wiltshore, UK) as described by Kohmer et al [13]. After a storage time of eight days at room temperature reflecting a reasonable time interval between sampling and laboratory testing in centralized screening approaches, in a part of the samples DNA was extracted from 200μl and eluted in 60μl as described in the Material and Methods section prior CMV PCR.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Saliva samples. Consistent with a previous study, which evaluated the performance of different swabbing materials and transport time with regard to the efficacy of CMV DNA recovery [13], buccal swabs were obtained with the eNAT™ kit consisting of 1 ml eNAT™ transport and preservation medium in 12x80mm screw cap tubes and a regular FLOQSwab™ (Copan, Brescia, Italy, order number eNAT™ kit: 608CS01R). Swabs were immediately immersed in the eNAT™ medium, stored at 4˚C, and shipped weekly from the screening clinics at ambient temperature to the Institute of Clinical and Molecular Virology at the University Hospital Erlangen, Germany (central study laboratory) for CMV DNA analyses.…”
Section: Sample Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation