2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.09.186
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Laboratory evaluation of electromagnetic density gauges for hot-mix asphalt mixture density measurement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
18
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Gradation segregation is one of the main factors affecting the durability of asphalt pavement, because both coarse and fine aggregate segregation may lead to pavement failures. These failures reduce the service performance and service life of asphalt pavement [2][3][4][5]. Therefore, efforts have been devoted by various researchers for gaining improved insight into the mechanism, affecting factors, measurement and evaluation methods of aggregate gradation segregation [6][7][8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gradation segregation is one of the main factors affecting the durability of asphalt pavement, because both coarse and fine aggregate segregation may lead to pavement failures. These failures reduce the service performance and service life of asphalt pavement [2][3][4][5]. Therefore, efforts have been devoted by various researchers for gaining improved insight into the mechanism, affecting factors, measurement and evaluation methods of aggregate gradation segregation [6][7][8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, they continue to present a logistical challenge. The radiation source requires careful handling, special vehicles are often required for transportation, tunnels and other areas with hazardous material restrictions must be avoided, nuclear material handling training is usually required for technicians and gauges are typically heavy and are not readily carried around construction sites [13]. Furthermore, many technicians report that the repeatability is inadequate, with multiple readings in the same location concerningly variable.…”
Section: Nuclear Density Gaugesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, there is no disagreement that mixture temperature and the presence of moisture on the surface significantly impact NNDG results. Furthermore, most researchers have reported some [13,16] aspects of the mixture composition, such as aggregate source, grading and maximum size, as important, with all researchers, and the manufacturer, recommending mixture-specific calibration. Consequently, NNDGs must be calibrated to the specific mixture being tested and it is best to test the surface at a temperature and moisture content that is consistent with the conditions during the calibration.…”
Section: Factors Affecting Nndg Reliabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, instrument reduced the number of cores drilled out as the compactness of the pavement was assessed to a good level of accuracy using step frequency radar [20]. Leng et al (2018) evaluate the non-nuclear density gauge under various laboratory-controlled conditions have concluded that the direction of placing the instrument has no effect on density readings. They also concluded that gauge efficiency is affected by different gradations, but it has no clear effect by the bitumen content [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Leng et al (2018) evaluate the non-nuclear density gauge under various laboratory-controlled conditions have concluded that the direction of placing the instrument has no effect on density readings. They also concluded that gauge efficiency is affected by different gradations, but it has no clear effect by the bitumen content [21]. Van den Bergh et al (2017) carried out to monitor the compaction process concludes that immediate evaluation using density gauge is important to get accurate results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%