2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.geotexmem.2009.12.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Laboratory evaluation of the behavior of a geotextile reinforced clay

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
17
0
4

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
17
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Water-saturation of the shearing zone of the samples caused the decrease of the interfacial friction resistance from 14% to 1% at the degree of compaction I S = 0.90, and from 20% to 1% at the degree of compaction I S = 1.00, with the increase in normal stresses from 50 to 300 kPa. This relationship is consistent with results presented by Noorzad and Mirmoradi [61], Khoury et al [62], Cahi and Saito [53] or Jotisankasa and Rurgchaisiri [4] obtained for different soils and geotextiles, and it is consistent with the theory of shear strength of unsaturated soils [63]. Theory and test results indicate that the presence of suction stress within unsaturated soil causes its shear strength to be higher than that of saturated soil.…”
Section: Shear Strength and Interfacial Friction Resistancesupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Water-saturation of the shearing zone of the samples caused the decrease of the interfacial friction resistance from 14% to 1% at the degree of compaction I S = 0.90, and from 20% to 1% at the degree of compaction I S = 1.00, with the increase in normal stresses from 50 to 300 kPa. This relationship is consistent with results presented by Noorzad and Mirmoradi [61], Khoury et al [62], Cahi and Saito [53] or Jotisankasa and Rurgchaisiri [4] obtained for different soils and geotextiles, and it is consistent with the theory of shear strength of unsaturated soils [63]. Theory and test results indicate that the presence of suction stress within unsaturated soil causes its shear strength to be higher than that of saturated soil.…”
Section: Shear Strength and Interfacial Friction Resistancesupporting
confidence: 91%
“…A great number of studies have been conducted in order to use geotextile in applications such as strengthening and reinforcing the retaining walls [7], drainage in water transfer canals [8], and dams [9]. In erosion control, the geotextile protects soil surfaces from the tractive forces of moving water and rainfall erosion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Utilizing tensile elements, such as fibers and fiber bundles to improve the tensile strength and the flexural strength, has the advantage of improving the strength and durability of improved soil and will furthermore be effective because of its strength isotropy, absence of potential failure plane, improvement in peak friction angle and cohesion, environmentally savings and economical cost (Kaniraj and Havanagi, 2001;Sobhan and Mashnad, 2002;Yetimoglu et al, 2005;Kumar et al, 2006;Viswanadham et al, 2009;Park, 2011;Hejazi et al, 2012;Mirzababaei et al, 2012;Onyejekwe and Ghataora, 2014;Jamsawang et al, 2014). Several past studies have proved the effectiveness of polymer fiber reinforcement in treating cemented soft soil and provided experimental evidence on the improvement in its mechanical behavior (Li et al, 1995;Kaniraj and Gayathri, 2003;Tang et al, 2007;Park, 2009;Noorzad and Mirmoradi, 2010;Tang and Gu, 2011). However, most of these earlier investigations have focused on polypropylene fiber as a reinforcement material only and furthermore neglected crucial information such as the effect of cement content, fiber content and fiber length.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%