2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2006.09.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Laboratory evolution of polyandry in the parasitoid wasp Nasonia vitripennis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
32
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
0
32
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, van den Assem & Jachmann (1999) were the first to observe an increase in polyandry in populations of Nasonia vitripennis that had been maintained in the laboratory (polyandry appears to be rare but not absent in the wild; see above). Subsequent studies have confirmed that the probability of remating in this species increases with time spent under mass culture conditions (Burton-Chellew et al , a 2007; Grillenberger et al , 2008) and polyandry has both an additive and a non-additive genetic component (Shuker et al , 2007). However, laboratory selection does not affect all species of Nasonia equally, as in a separate study Nasonia longicornis were less likely to remate than N. vitripennis (Leonard & Boake, 2008).…”
Section: The Occurrence and Evolution Of Polyandrymentioning
confidence: 77%
“…For instance, van den Assem & Jachmann (1999) were the first to observe an increase in polyandry in populations of Nasonia vitripennis that had been maintained in the laboratory (polyandry appears to be rare but not absent in the wild; see above). Subsequent studies have confirmed that the probability of remating in this species increases with time spent under mass culture conditions (Burton-Chellew et al , a 2007; Grillenberger et al , 2008) and polyandry has both an additive and a non-additive genetic component (Shuker et al , 2007). However, laboratory selection does not affect all species of Nasonia equally, as in a separate study Nasonia longicornis were less likely to remate than N. vitripennis (Leonard & Boake, 2008).…”
Section: The Occurrence and Evolution Of Polyandrymentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Evolutionary genetic studies of Nasonia have been conducted on sex-ratio (Werren, 1980; Skinner, 1982), interspecific differences in morphology (Weston et al ., 1999; Gadau et al ., 1999; Clark et al, in review), hybrid breakdown (Breeuwer & Werren, 1995; Gadau et al , 1999, 2002; Niehuis et al ., 2008; Clark et al ., in review), host-endosymbiont interactions (Breewuer et al ., 1992; Bordenstein et al ., 2001, 2006), courtship and mating behaviour (Beukeboom & van den Assem, 2002; Velthuis et al ., 2004; Burton-Chellew et al ., 2007) and early development (Lynch et al ., 2006; Rosenberg et al , 2009). Any additional species in the genus would broaden and strengthen this model system, especially for evolutionary genetic studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although single mating appears to be the rule in nature and the spermatheca is typically fi lled with one copulation (Van den Assem and Feuth-De Bruijn, 1977 ), multiple mating is often observed in laboratory strains (Van den Assem and Jachmann, 1999 ;Burton-Chellew et al, 2007 ). We found a clear eff ect of male species on female re-mating rate, both N. vitripennis and N. giraulti females mated more frequently after having fi rst mated a heterospecifi c male.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 48%
“…Because Nasonia females typically mate only once, and the spermatheca is fi lled with one insemination (Holmes, 1974 ;Van den Assem and Feuth-De Bruijn, 1977 ; own observations), adaptations to sperm competition are less likely to be present. Typically, female receptivity is irreversibly turned off by a bout of post-copulatory behaviour of the male (Van den Assem and Visser, 1976 ), but multiple mating tends to increase in laboratory populations over time (Van den Assem and Jachmann, 1999 ;Burton-Chellew et al, 2007 ). Th is suggests that Nasonia mating behaviour is not unalterable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%