2014
DOI: 10.1080/10298436.2014.953502
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Laboratory investigation of moisture susceptibility of warm-mix asphalt mixtures containing steel slag aggregates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0
5

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
20
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…E Masad et al [7] noted that the steel slag has the stronger bonding strength with asphalt binder in comparison to natural aggregates. Moreover, the water damage resistance, as well as the stiffness and fatigue life of steel slag based asphalt mixture also improved due to the vesicular and pitted structure of steel slag [8][9][10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…E Masad et al [7] noted that the steel slag has the stronger bonding strength with asphalt binder in comparison to natural aggregates. Moreover, the water damage resistance, as well as the stiffness and fatigue life of steel slag based asphalt mixture also improved due to the vesicular and pitted structure of steel slag [8][9][10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a separate study, modified bitumen affinity with EAFS as the coarse aggregate showed enhanced adhesion and moisture resistance of Warm Mix Asphalt (Ameri et al, 2013;Hesami et al, 2014).…”
Section: Moisture Sensitivitymentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The use of EAF slag fines has been rejected for warm mixes and water sensitivity in HMA was greatly worsened. Optimal moisture resistance appeared with slag as coarse aggregate and limestone as fines (Hesami et al, 2014;Oluwasola et al, 2015a, b). The expensive crushing procedures of EAF slag may also be noted that is on the whole a coarse material, so its drawbacks as a fine aggregate are mainly economic rather than technical (Fonseca et al, 2013;Wang et al, 2013).…”
Section: Usesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations