2021
DOI: 10.1002/essoar.10504150.2
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Laboratory landquakes: Insights from experiments into the high-frequency seismic signal generated by geophysical granular flows

Abstract: We conducted novel laboratory experiments to test five existing models for the high-frequency seismic signals generated by granular flows • The 'thin-flow' model of Farin et al. (2019) was the most accurate and makes predictions consistent with empirical observations • The ratio between the mean and fluctuating forces exerted by a granular flow varies greatly, determined by an inertial number of the flow

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These and all other variables are listed in Text S1 and all code used to perform these analyses is available at Arran et al. (2021).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These and all other variables are listed in Text S1 and all code used to perform these analyses is available at Arran et al. (2021).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experimental data are available at the Pangaea repository (Arran et al., 2020), while computations were performed and plots produced with the summary data and code at Zenodo (Arran et al., 2021), using NumPy (Harris et al., 2020), Matplotlib (Hunter, 2007), and pandas (McKinney, 2010).…”
Section: Data Availability Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, although various models based on the Tsai et al. (2012) paradigm have been tested against laboratory experimental data (Arran et al., 2021; de Haas et al., 2021), these models have not yet been thoroughly verified against independent field data (Allstadt et al., 2020; Zhang et al., 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are essentially two properties of the high-frequency seismic signals generated by mass movements that have been studied in correlation with the physical parameters of the source dynamics, the maximum amplitude of the seismic signal corrected for propagation effects A 0 , and the energy of the seismic signal at the source E s (e.g., Norris, 1994;Deparis et al, 2008;Dammeier et al, 2011;Schneider et al, 2011;Hibert et al, 2011;Bottelin et al, 2014;Levy et al, 2015;Farin et al, 2015Farin et al, , 2016Hibert et al, 2017b, a;Saló et al, 2018;Le Roy et al, 2019;Farin et al, 2019;Arran et al, 2020). These two quantities are usually compared to the source velocity, momentum, and its kinetic and potential energies.…”
Section: Seismic Sources Parameters Computationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent studies proposed scaling laws between high-frequency seismic signal features and source properties of rockfalls and landslides. These studies are mostly based on laboratory experiments (e.g., Farin et al, 2015Farin et al, , 2016Farin et al, , 2019Arran et al, 2020), real-scale experiments (e.g., Bottelin et al, 2014;Hibert et al, 2017b;Saló et al, 2018), and documented natural events (e.g., Norris, 1994;Deparis et al, 2008;Dammeier et al, 2011;Hibert et al, 2011;Levy et al, 2015;Hibert et al, 2017a;Le Roy et al, 2019). Among the quantities studied, several correlations between the mass and the velocity of the rockfall, and the magnitude, the maximum amplitude at the source and the seismic energy of the seismic signal have been observed and sometimes quantified.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%