2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jconhyd.2008.01.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Laboratory longitudinal diffusion tests: 2. Parameter estimation by inverse analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The chemical osmosis experiments were terminated after the solute concentration in the upstream reservoir, which contains the low‐concentration solution, increased at least by 3% of the initial concentration difference Δ C 0 . This threshold value is low; however, the concurrent analysis of both the upstream and downstream reservoir concentrations ensures the reliable estimation of the diffusion coefficient as suggested for the through‐diffusion experiment with limited reservoir volumes [ Takeda et al , ]. In a series of experiments, the reservoir solutions were circulated at a constant flow rate of 10 mL/min; the temperature of the incubator was set at 40°C.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The chemical osmosis experiments were terminated after the solute concentration in the upstream reservoir, which contains the low‐concentration solution, increased at least by 3% of the initial concentration difference Δ C 0 . This threshold value is low; however, the concurrent analysis of both the upstream and downstream reservoir concentrations ensures the reliable estimation of the diffusion coefficient as suggested for the through‐diffusion experiment with limited reservoir volumes [ Takeda et al , ]. In a series of experiments, the reservoir solutions were circulated at a constant flow rate of 10 mL/min; the temperature of the incubator was set at 40°C.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among these models, the VC–CC model is rarely designed and performed. Certain studies have presented overviews and discussed the differences of those models, and the diffusion coefficient estimated methods were also provided [ 2 , 10 , 11 ]. However, these studies have not considered the decay effect in the radioactive nuclide diffusion experiment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%