2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.icarus.2020.113972
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Laboratory measurements of initial launch velocities of electrostatically lofted dust on airless planetary bodies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…54 However, recent experiments show that the electrostatic dust lifting is reciprocally proportional to the particle radius, depends on the particle shape, and shows a broad range of launch angles. 55 Some of these charged particles merge via cohesive forces into clumps. 56 These clumps increase in mass, which decreases their levitating height during the next lunar sunrise.…”
Section: Quantification Of Lunar Impact Dust Accumulation Rates On La...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…54 However, recent experiments show that the electrostatic dust lifting is reciprocally proportional to the particle radius, depends on the particle shape, and shows a broad range of launch angles. 55 Some of these charged particles merge via cohesive forces into clumps. 56 These clumps increase in mass, which decreases their levitating height during the next lunar sunrise.…”
Section: Quantification Of Lunar Impact Dust Accumulation Rates On La...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The measurable particle size is in the range of 0.5-90 μm with measurement accuracy of 0.5%. In previous studies, as shown in Table 1, the dust transport process was recorded by a high-speed video camera, and dust velocities and diameters were extracted from stacked images (Wang et al 2016;Hood et al 2018;Örger et al 2019;Carroll et al 2020). However, partial dust migration cannot be detected or tracked by cameras, such as grains whose diameters were lower than several microns (limited by the image resolution), grains that cannot reflect sufficient light consistently, and grains that travel away from the focus range of the camera (Örger et al 2019).…”
Section: Experimental Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on these laboratory results, a new "patched charge model" has been proposed to explain that, in typical plasma conditions, the net electrostatic force according to the shared model is not enough to overcome gravity (Wang et al 2016). Then, when exposed to a 120 eV electron beam, the lifting rate of dust grains over time (Hood et al 2018) and the initial launch velocities of these dust grains (Carroll et al 2020) have been discussed. The results show that such intense electrostatic dust lifting can only last over a short duration and that the launch velocity of electrostatically lifted dust is related to its particle size and shape.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The measurable particle size is in the range of 0.5 to 90 µm with measurement accuracy of 0.5%. In previous studies, as shown in Table 1, the dust transport process was recorded by a high-speed video camera, and dust velocities and diameters were extracted from stacked images (Wang et al 2016;Hood et al 2018;Örger et al 2019;Carroll et al 2020). However, partial Note-The diameter range represents the range of particle size that can be detected by the corresponding method, rather than the range of particle size measured in the research.…”
Section: Experimental Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%