2018
DOI: 10.1130/ges01630.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Laboratory measurements quantifying elastic properties of accretionary wedge sediments: Implications for slip to the trench during the 2011 Mw 9.0 Tohoku-Oki earthquake

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 89 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This hinders understanding of the additional role that realistic elastic properties along the fault have on the dynamics of megathrust events, and may lead to dynamic models in which depth‐dependent fault friction is the only ingredient available to explain seismological observations. On the other hand, in some models (e.g., Kozdon & Dunham, 2013; Ma, 2012), the value of rigidity considered in the shallow megathrust is one order of magnitude larger than the value estimated from drilling samples (Jeppson et al., 2018). The overestimation of elastic properties involved in the shallow rupture may lead to underestimation of slip, uplift and tsunami size (e.g., Geist & Bilek, 2001; Satake, 1994), thus underestimating related hazards.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…This hinders understanding of the additional role that realistic elastic properties along the fault have on the dynamics of megathrust events, and may lead to dynamic models in which depth‐dependent fault friction is the only ingredient available to explain seismological observations. On the other hand, in some models (e.g., Kozdon & Dunham, 2013; Ma, 2012), the value of rigidity considered in the shallow megathrust is one order of magnitude larger than the value estimated from drilling samples (Jeppson et al., 2018). The overestimation of elastic properties involved in the shallow rupture may lead to underestimation of slip, uplift and tsunami size (e.g., Geist & Bilek, 2001; Satake, 1994), thus underestimating related hazards.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…A pore pressure of 1 MPa was maintained throughout. A detailed description of the method is provided in the supporting information (see also Jeppson & Tobin, 2015; Jeppson et al, 2018).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Slip often localizes within velocity-strengthening clays (Saffer & Marone, 2003;Ikari et al, 2009;Faulkner et al, 2011). Elastic moduli and wave speeds are greatly reduced Jeppson et al, 2018), which generally enhances slip and reduces rupture velocity (Ma & Beroza, 2008;Lotto et al, 2017Lotto et al, , 2018. It is also possible that this region experiences inelastic deformation during great earthquakes (Ma, 2012;Ma & Hirakawa, 2013;Ma & Nie, 2019); however, whether that inelastic deformation takes the form of distributed plastic strain or is instead localized as slip on splays and other structures remains unclear.…”
Section: Dynamic Rupture and Tsunamismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The soft muds of this frontal region are likely to have distinctly different material and seismic properties than the more consolidated rock further downdip (e.g., Saffer & Marone, 2003;Ikari et al, 2009;Faulkner et al, 2011;Jeppson et al, 2018). As yet, we do not fully understand whether earthquakes can initiate, how slip propagates, and how seismic radiation is emitted within this region, and examples of earthquakes where we can sufficiently resolve slip in the updip section of the megathrust (e.g., 2010 Mentawai, Hill et al, 2012) remain rare.…”
Section: Outstanding Science Questionsmentioning
confidence: 99%