2012
DOI: 10.1007/s00253-012-4177-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Laboratory metabolic evolution improves acetate tolerance and growth on acetate of ethanologenic Escherichia coli under non-aerated conditions in glucose-mineral medium

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
66
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
3
66
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Classical evolution methods involving strain enrichment under selective pressure have been used with the goal of improving acetate tolerance in order to improve acetate production by Clostridium thermoaceticum (Reed et al 1987) and A. aceti (Steiner and Sauer 2003a). This technique has also been used to increase acetate tolerance of Zymomonas mobilis (Joachimsthal et al 1998) and E. coli (Steiner and Sauer 2003b;Fernández-Sandoval et al 2012). Improving acetate tolerance in E. coli has also been addressed through the use of global transcription machinery engineering (gTME) (Chong et al 2013) and scalar analysis of library enrichments (SCALES) (Sandoval et al 2011).…”
Section: Other Bacteriamentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Classical evolution methods involving strain enrichment under selective pressure have been used with the goal of improving acetate tolerance in order to improve acetate production by Clostridium thermoaceticum (Reed et al 1987) and A. aceti (Steiner and Sauer 2003a). This technique has also been used to increase acetate tolerance of Zymomonas mobilis (Joachimsthal et al 1998) and E. coli (Steiner and Sauer 2003b;Fernández-Sandoval et al 2012). Improving acetate tolerance in E. coli has also been addressed through the use of global transcription machinery engineering (gTME) (Chong et al 2013) and scalar analysis of library enrichments (SCALES) (Sandoval et al 2011).…”
Section: Other Bacteriamentioning
confidence: 98%
“…It is a hindrance due to its presence at inhibitory concentrations in biomass hydrolysate (Martinez et al 2001;Mills et al 2009;Taylor et al 2012), though at low concentrations, acetate has been observed to slightly increase product titers (Fernández-Sandoval et al 2012). It is used as a substrate in the production of polyhydroxyalkanoates, such as poly-3-hydroxybutyrate (PHB) (Wang and Yu 2000).…”
Section: Biorenewablesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Escherichia coli has been shown to be an efficient fermentation strain for mixed hexose-pentose solutions (Fernández-Sandoval et al 2012). In this work, sulfuric acid prehydrolysates of OTB were submitted to fermentability tests by an ethanologenic E. coli.…”
Section: Fermentability Tests Of Prehydrolysatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The objective of this work was to produce ethanol fuel from hemicellulosic sugars of rape straw using an ethanologenic E. coli that is a microorganism able to produce ethanol from xylose and glucose in presence of high acetic acid concentrations (Fernández-Sandoval et al, 2012). For the first time with this feedstock, bioethanol production from hemicellulose sugars has been reported.…”
Section: Acid Pretreatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Escherichia coli is a bacterium able to carry out the co-fermentation of C5 and C6 sugars although without high ethanol production. However, several researches have been carried out engineering of bacterial pathways to generate E. coli strains able to achieve higher ethanol yields (Fernández-Sandoval et al, 2012). Different genetically engineered E. coli strains have been used to ferment hydrolysates from corn stover (Jin et al, 2012), Eucalyptus (Castro et al, 2014), sugarcane bagasse (Geddes et al, 2011) or wheat straw (Saha et al, 2011) yielding higher ethanol productions and showing more resistance to toxic compounds than traditional ethanologenic microorganisms.…”
Section: Acid Pretreatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%