2023
DOI: 10.3390/fluids8040106
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Laboratory Models of Planetary Core-Style Convective Turbulence

Abstract: The connection between the heat transfer and characteristic flow velocities of planetary core-style convection remains poorly understood. To address this, we present novel laboratory models of rotating Rayleigh–Bénard convection in which heat and momentum transfer are simultaneously measured. Using water (Prandtl number, Pr≃6) and cylindrical containers of diameter-to-height aspect ratios of Γ≃3,1.5,0.75, the non-dimensional rotation period (Ekman number, E) is varied between 10−7≲E≲3×10−5 and the non-dimensio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
4
1

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 168 publications
3
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is in line with the analysis of Hawkins et al. (2023) (also covered in Hawkins 2020), who similarly reported co-scaling of VAC and CIA relations based on measurements using laser Doppler velocimetry. We can insert these numbers into the scaling relations (2.11) and (2.14) for a quantitative comparison.…”
Section: Reynolds Number Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…This is in line with the analysis of Hawkins et al. (2023) (also covered in Hawkins 2020), who similarly reported co-scaling of VAC and CIA relations based on measurements using laser Doppler velocimetry. We can insert these numbers into the scaling relations (2.11) and (2.14) for a quantitative comparison.…”
Section: Reynolds Number Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Hawkins et al. (2023) conclude that pure CIA scaling is not observed given that the is still affected by boundary-layer dynamics and thus not diffusion-free yet – a result that we share (Cheng et al. 2020).…”
Section: Reynolds Number Resultssupporting
confidence: 66%
See 3 more Smart Citations