2018
DOI: 10.1007/s00265-017-2437-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Laboratory-reared and field-collected predators respond differently to same experimental treatments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Crickets were raised on specialized dietary media (Table ) for 1 week to ensure proper nutrient content (following Wiggins, Bounds, & Wilder, 2018). These diet treatments were chosen because they were shown to change prey quality enough to affect the behavior of another spider species (Wiggins et al., 2018). Although the differences that we observed in the macronutrient content of the prey treatments in this study were smaller than those previously reported for these prey treatments (Wiggins et al., 2018).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Crickets were raised on specialized dietary media (Table ) for 1 week to ensure proper nutrient content (following Wiggins, Bounds, & Wilder, 2018). These diet treatments were chosen because they were shown to change prey quality enough to affect the behavior of another spider species (Wiggins et al., 2018). Although the differences that we observed in the macronutrient content of the prey treatments in this study were smaller than those previously reported for these prey treatments (Wiggins et al., 2018).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These diet treatments were chosen because they were shown to change prey quality enough to affect the behavior of another spider species (Wiggins et al., 2018). Although the differences that we observed in the macronutrient content of the prey treatments in this study were smaller than those previously reported for these prey treatments (Wiggins et al., 2018). Spiders were randomly assigned to one of eight treatments: 20°C/high‐lipid prey ( n = 10), 20°C/high‐protein prey ( n = 10), 25°C/high‐lipid prey ( n = 11), 25°C/high‐protein prey ( n = 11), 30°C/high‐lipid prey ( n = 10), 30°C/high‐protein prey ( n = 10) and 35°C/high‐lipid prey ( n = 10), and 35°C/high‐protein prey ( n = 10).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…An explanation for this inconsistency could be that in , males were collected from the wild whereas in Wilder and Schneider (2017) males were raised in the laboratory, under a less diverse diet. This study should be replicated again using males and females from the field and the lab and assess whether essential amino acids might be in shortage in the field (Wiggins et al 2018). If so, the male body, despite being very small might indeed be a valuable addition for the female diet and this effect might explain selection on females to maximize their chances to consume at least one male.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%