2021
DOI: 10.1080/09583157.2021.2010653
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Laboratory screening of entomopathogenic fungi and nematodes for pathogenicity against the obscure mealybug, Pseudococcus viburni (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, the MHK isolate was as efficient in reducing larval survival and impacting mosquito development as the GHA isolate. Similar results have been reported in studies assessing the entomopathogenic activity of local B. bassiana isolates towards several insects, including mealybug adults and red palm weevils, as compared to commercially available isolates (Sutanto et al 2021, Mathulwe et al 2022). While we acknowledge that statistical evaluation of efficacy between the two fungal isolates is not possible in our study, as larval exposures were conducted using different mosquito generations, our study confirms that the entomopathogenicity of B. bassiana on mosquito larvae is maintained in the MHK isolate.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Indeed, the MHK isolate was as efficient in reducing larval survival and impacting mosquito development as the GHA isolate. Similar results have been reported in studies assessing the entomopathogenic activity of local B. bassiana isolates towards several insects, including mealybug adults and red palm weevils, as compared to commercially available isolates (Sutanto et al 2021, Mathulwe et al 2022). While we acknowledge that statistical evaluation of efficacy between the two fungal isolates is not possible in our study, as larval exposures were conducted using different mosquito generations, our study confirms that the entomopathogenicity of B. bassiana on mosquito larvae is maintained in the MHK isolate.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Following the above-mentioned procedure, the fungal concentrate in the beaker was poured back into the 28-ml McCartney bottles and vortex-mixed for 2 min. The concentrate was then used as the conidial stock for the serial dilutions (Mathulwe et al 2021). The methods employed by Inglis et al (2012) were followed to quantify the conidial concentration per unit volume.…”
Section: Preparation Of Conidial Suspensionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The bottles containing conidia were sealed, and vortex-mixed for 2 min to produce a homogenous suspension. The conidial suspension was poured into a sterile 100-ml glass beaker, through an organza fabric, to remove the fungal hyphae and mycelium, before being poured back into the McCartney bottle, vortex-mixed for 2 min, and used as the conidial stock (Mathulwe et al 2022). One ml of the conidial stock was transferred into a McCartney (28 ml) glass bottles containing 9 ml of sterile distilled water, and vortex mixed for 3-4 min to produce a homogenous suspension.…”
Section: Preparation Of Conidial Suspensionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The conidia were counted as viable if they developed a germ tube, and those without a germ tube were counted as non-viable. The average number of viable conidia were calculated from the three plates, and only conidial suspensions with percentage viability of >85% were used in the screening bioassay (Mathulwe et al 2022).…”
Section: Preparation Of Conidial Suspensionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation