Laboratory Studies for Light-Oil Air Injection Projects: Potential Application in Handil Field

Abstract

Summary Air injection into light-oil reservoirs is now a proven field technique. Because of the unlimited availability and the nil access cost of the injectant, the application potential of this improved recovery process is promising when associated with the lack of available hydrocarbon gas sources for injection. One of the keys of a successful air injection project is the evaluation of the process by carrying out representative laboratory studies. Therefore, an original laboratory strategy was proposed to assess the recovery potential by air injection into light-oil reservoirs, and to help the determination and the quantification of optimal operating conditions. In this paper, the air injection technique applied to light-oil reservoirs is explained. Then, the laboratory strategy proposed for the evaluation of an air injection project is described, and the experimental objectives, devices, and procedures are explained. In order to provide reliable experimental data, high-pressure and high-temperature experiments (up to 40 MPa and 500°C) are performed with consolidated reservoir cores and reservoir oils, at representative conditions of the air injection process in light-oil reservoirs. Finally, a laboratory evaluation regarding a potential application for an air injection pilot in the Handil field (Mahakam delta, Indonesia) is presented and discussed. Introduction Air Injection Process into Light-Oil Reservoirs. When air is injected into a reservoir, the oxygen contained in the air reacts with the hydrocarbons by various oxidation reactions. Heat is evolved from these reactions. High initial reservoir temperatures promote larger heat production. Two study cases must then be differentiated in the light-oil reservoir.When the thermal losses through the rock are limited compared with the heat generated by the reactions, the temperature in the reservoir increases. In this case, complete oxidation reactions providing carbon-oxide gases can be self-ignited in the reservoir. As reported in recent studies, 1 the oxygen is then consumed in a confined zone called an oxidation (or combustion)front. The size of this zone depends on the air injection rate, the characteristics of the oil, and the formation. In light-oil reservoirs, typical oxidation front temperatures of 200 to 400°C (about 400 to 800°F) can be reached. The produced combustion gases consist of CO 2 and CO with CO/CO2˜0.15, depending on the temperatures reached and the oil characteristics.When the thermal losses through the rock are high, or when the heat release is not high enough to increase the temperature significantly (in the case of high-water saturations or low-oil saturations), the oxidation reactions occur at a temperature close to the initial reservoir temperature. In this case, oxidation reactions can be partial with a lower carbon-oxide generation than in the previous case. The oxygen consumption occurs then through a larger reservoir zone, the size of which depends upon the oil reactivity.2 Several field experiences**3,4 have shown that high levels of CO2 may be produced. This would suggest that spontaneous ignition, with generation of a high-temperature front and the production of associated carbon-oxide gases, is most likely occurring in light-oil reservoirs. The generation of a high-temperature oxidation zone (200 to 400°C) is preferable because of a higher oxygen uptake potential, a more efficient carbon-oxide generation, and the creation of an oil bank downstream of the thermal front. Both of the latter factors contribute to the improvement of the recovery. In both cases, the important point to assess is oxygen consumption to prevent oxygen arrival at the producers. This is one of the main objectives of air injection experiments. Reservoir Zones to be Distinguished. When a high-temperature thermal front is ignited, four main zones can be distinguished in the reservoir (Fig. 1):The zone swept by the combustion front, where the residual oil saturation is low and the temperature higher than the initial reservoir temperature.The oxidation front where oxygen is consumed. The temperature can reach400°C Part of the original oil is burnt (about 5 to 10% OOIP) and CO2 and CO are produced. The gas formed by the remaining nitrogen from the air and the combustion gases is called "flue gas" (typically, 85% of N2 13% of CO2 and 2%of CO) and sweeps the reservoir downstream.A short zone downstream of the combustion front where thermal effects participate in the formation of an oil bank. This oil bank is partially displaced by the flue gas and by hot water or a steam front according to the reservoir conditions.A wide zone downstream of the combustion front where no thermal effects occur. This zone, which contains original oil, is not affected by the thermal effects and is swept by the flue gas. When the oxidation reactions occur at low temperature (close to the reservoir temperature), three main zones can be distinguished:A zone around the injector which is swept by the injected air. In this area, residual oil saturation is low. The oil is partially oxidized but can no longer consume oxygen.A large oxidation zone where oxygen is consumed by the residual oil left after flue gas sweeping. The oxygen concentration in the gas phase progressively decreases from 21 to 0%.A wide zone downstream of the oxidation zone, swept by the flue gas at reservoir temperature, as in the previous case (high-temperature front).However, in this case, less carbon oxides have been generated by oxidation reactions and the flue gas is mainly composed of nitrogen. In practice, both cases can co-exist in a given reservoir, according to the local reservoir properties.

Is High-Pressure Air Injection (HPAI) Simply a Flue-Gas Flood?

“…However, while in conventional gasfloods the GOR tends to increase exponentially after gas breakthrough, combustion GORs tend to flatten out with time so shutting the well in may not be the best alternative. As suggested by Moore et al 11 the best approach may be to shut in the injector that is believed to service the production well(s) in question.…”

An Equation-of-State Compositional In-Situ Combustion Model: A Study of Phase Behavior Sensitivity

“…For heavy oils, the recovery efficiency is substantially improved because of the dramatic reduction of the viscosity of heavy oils with temperature. However, ISC is applicable to lighter oils as well because it also promotes production through flue-gas drive, thermal expansion, steam and water drive, and vaporization of lighter oils (Gillham et al 1997;Clara et al 2000). ISC can recover oil economically from a variety of reservoir settings.…”

Recovery of light oil by air injection at medium temperature: Experiments

“…The effectiveness of HPAI depends on many oil recovery mechanisms [13] including sweeping by flue gases, field re-pressurization by the injected gas, oil swelling, oil viscosity reduction, stripping off light components from the oil by flue gas, and thermal effects generated by the oxidation reactions. The maximum amount of oil recovery in combustion processes is the initial oil-in-place exclusive the amount of fuel consumed in the combustion reactions [41], i.e., even residual oil may be produced.…”