Treatise on Geophysics 2007
DOI: 10.1016/b978-044452748-6.00116-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Laboratory Studies of Mantle Convection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 396 publications
(566 reference statements)
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An exponent n = 1 ∕ 3 in equation means that heat loss is governed solely by local instabilities of the upper thermal boundary layer (TBL) and does not depend explicitly on the magma ocean thickness. It has been observed in experiments with constant viscosity for 10 6 < Ra < 10 10 with constant C 0 varying between 0.05 and 0.18 (see Siggia [] and Davaille and Limare [] for a review). On the other hand, the appearance of a large‐scale circulation connecting the top TBL to the bottom of the layer, either due to turbulent motions in confined boxes (for 10 8 < Ra < 10 14 , see Castaing [] and Grossmann and Lohse []) or due to large viscosity variations [e.g., Solomatov and Moresi , ; Androvandi et al , ] would give an exponent lower than 1 ∕ 3.…”
Section: The Modelmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…An exponent n = 1 ∕ 3 in equation means that heat loss is governed solely by local instabilities of the upper thermal boundary layer (TBL) and does not depend explicitly on the magma ocean thickness. It has been observed in experiments with constant viscosity for 10 6 < Ra < 10 10 with constant C 0 varying between 0.05 and 0.18 (see Siggia [] and Davaille and Limare [] for a review). On the other hand, the appearance of a large‐scale circulation connecting the top TBL to the bottom of the layer, either due to turbulent motions in confined boxes (for 10 8 < Ra < 10 14 , see Castaing [] and Grossmann and Lohse []) or due to large viscosity variations [e.g., Solomatov and Moresi , ; Androvandi et al , ] would give an exponent lower than 1 ∕ 3.…”
Section: The Modelmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Fluid dynamical modeling using laboratory experiments, theoretical arguments, and numerical simulations (for recent reviews, see Ribe et al . [], Ito and van Keken [], and Davaille and Limare [2007]) demonstrates that the physical characteristics of hotspots in many cases can be explained by plumes rising from the deep mantle, although shallow mantle origins have also been suggested [ King and Ritsema , ]. Seismological evidence for low velocity regions below hotspots have also been used to argue for the existence of plumes [ Montelli et al ., ; Wolfe et al ., ], although it is likely that application of standard tomographic techniques is limited due to the effects of wave front healing that may render plumes invisible in the deeper mantle [ Hwang et al ., ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When γ ≥ 10 4 , the "stagnant lid" regime prevails whereby convective motions develop below a stagnant viscous sublayer located at the surface, forming a "plate" (e.g., ref. [164] for a review). …”
Section: Convection In Planetary Mantlesmentioning
confidence: 99%