2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.coastaleng.2014.02.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Laboratory study on wave dissipation by vegetation in combined current–wave flow

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

20
199
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 198 publications
(219 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
20
199
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although several formulations can be found in the literature to estimate the drag coefficient for waves damped by vegetation (e.g. : Mendez et al, 1999;Maza et al, 2013) and more recently, waves and current attenuation (Hu et al, 2014), none of them are especially fitted for solitary waves. Tanino and Nepf (2008) proposed an empirical formulation for the mean drag coefficient for random cylinders arrays:…”
Section: Discussion On the Numerical Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although several formulations can be found in the literature to estimate the drag coefficient for waves damped by vegetation (e.g. : Mendez et al, 1999;Maza et al, 2013) and more recently, waves and current attenuation (Hu et al, 2014), none of them are especially fitted for solitary waves. Tanino and Nepf (2008) proposed an empirical formulation for the mean drag coefficient for random cylinders arrays:…”
Section: Discussion On the Numerical Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An exception is the study of Hu et al (2014), where drag forces were directly measured. Because the bulk drag coefficient is usually a result of computations, it also reflects all processes that are not or incorrectly captured in the model involved.…”
Section: Publicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Möller et al, 1999Möller et al, , 2014 and ambient currents (Hu et al, 2014). Therefore, wave attenuation rates measured in moderate conditions cannot be applied directly to severe storm conditions, and physical or semiempirical modelling approaches are required for estimating the wave damping capacity of vegetated foreshores under these more extreme circumstances.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While canopy effects on the hydrodynamics inside a canopy have been clearly confirmed, conditions at the canopy edge are more variable (Gruber & Kemp 2010). The edge of seagrass canopies is a dynamic region were both ambient hydrodynamics and sediment transport are modified (Fonseca et al 1982, Granata et al 2001, Tigny et al 2007, Gruber & Kemp 2010, Nepf 2012a with non-linear responses to variable morphodynamics (Zhu et al 2003, Fontan et al 2013, Hu et al 2014. Spatial fragmentation of meadows, whether natural or anthropogenic, dramatically increases the frequency of edges; however, the impact of fragmentation on hydrodynamic edge effects has been poorly documented.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%