2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.icarus.2017.05.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Laboratory tests of catastrophic disruption of rotating bodies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The distribution of particle sizes yielded by a catastrophic collision involving consolidated bodies has been studied in a number of laboratory experiments (e.g., Davis & Ryan 1990;Giacomuzzo et al 2007;Morris & Burchell 2017). The results suggest that a rollover toward small particles is common with a mass ratio of 10 −3 to 10 −4 relative to the target mass, although there is a scatter of behavior and also some level of concern that the rollover is a result of the difficulty in finding all of the smallest debris.…”
Section: Breakup Of Consolidated Bodiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The distribution of particle sizes yielded by a catastrophic collision involving consolidated bodies has been studied in a number of laboratory experiments (e.g., Davis & Ryan 1990;Giacomuzzo et al 2007;Morris & Burchell 2017). The results suggest that a rollover toward small particles is common with a mass ratio of 10 −3 to 10 −4 relative to the target mass, although there is a scatter of behavior and also some level of concern that the rollover is a result of the difficulty in finding all of the smallest debris.…”
Section: Breakup Of Consolidated Bodiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The prior studies manipulated both projectile and target materials, and used basalt, glass, porous gypsum, ice, and snow to examine the effects of porosity, inclusion, and static strength on the impact strength. The size ratio of the projectile to the target, the target shape, the target rotation rate, and the impact velocity were also manipulated to elucidate how these parameters affect the impact strength and the ejection velocity of impact fragments [e.g., Gault and Wedekind, 1969;Fujiwara et al, 1977;Kawakami et al, 1983;Arakawa, 1999a;Arakawa et al, 2002;Okamoto and Arakawa, 2009;Yasui and Arakawa, 2011;Morris and Burchell, 2017]. Impact strength is defined as a specific energy when the largest fragment mass is one-half of the original target mass, and the specific energy is defined as the kinetic energy of the impactor per unit mass of the target.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Right column: The monomers are colored according to the largest magnitude of the normal force F N exerted from its connected neighbours where F N > 0 (green) represents pushing forces while F N < 0 (red) are pulling forces, respectively. ing monomers may potentially destroy the entire aggregate in a catastrophic disruption event (Benz & Asphaug 1999;Morris & Burchell 2017;Schwartz et al 2018). What we find with our N-body simulations is that accelerated rotation deforms initially more roundish aggregates preferentially into oblate shapes.…”
Section: Rotational Deformation Of Grain Shapesmentioning
confidence: 99%