2022
DOI: 10.1080/13625187.2022.2102604
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Labour induction for termination of pregnancy with severe fetal anomalies after 24 weeks’ gestation: a case series and systematic review of the literature

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 21 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been reported [14] that combined mifepristone-misoprostol could resulted in shorter induction-to-delivery intervals for the second trimester induce of labour(IOL), compared with the using of sulprostone, and in this study, they also reported cases of third-trimester stillbirth induction, whey all received misoprostol alone. Until now, the current literature on mifepristone-misoprostol using in the third trimester remains limited, compared with that in the second trimester, and few studies specified the actual number of patients in the third trimester, and future research is necessary on third-trimester outcomes with mifepristone-misoprostol [15].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been reported [14] that combined mifepristone-misoprostol could resulted in shorter induction-to-delivery intervals for the second trimester induce of labour(IOL), compared with the using of sulprostone, and in this study, they also reported cases of third-trimester stillbirth induction, whey all received misoprostol alone. Until now, the current literature on mifepristone-misoprostol using in the third trimester remains limited, compared with that in the second trimester, and few studies specified the actual number of patients in the third trimester, and future research is necessary on third-trimester outcomes with mifepristone-misoprostol [15].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%