Labour market experiences of skilled British migrants in Vancouver

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of the paper is to explore the labour market experiences of highly skilled migrants from developed countries who are not linguistic or visible minorities in the host country. Design/methodology/approach: The results of the paper derive from interviews with 64 highly skilled British migrants in Vancouver. Participants were asked open-and closed-ended questions and the data from the interviews were coded and analysed manually. Findings: British migrants were divided with their labour market outcomes. Some cited positive experiences such as better responsibility, treatment and salary, while others cited negative experiences such as having to re-accredit, unduly proving themselves to their employers and not having their international experience recognised. Research limitations/implications:The results are particular to a single case study, hence they cannot be generalised or taken to represent the experiences of all British skilled migrants in Vancouver. Practical implications: Governments and organisations should ensure that they fulfil any promises they made to highly skilled migrants before the migration process and manage their expectations. Otherwise they face problems with brain waste and migrant retention in the short term and attracting foreign talent in the long term. They should also consider taking a more flexible approach to recognising foreign qualifications, skills and international experience. Originality/value: The paper adds to our understanding of migrant groups from countries who share similar social and cultural characteristics to the host population. The paper shows that labour market integration challenges are not exclusive to low skilled visible minority migrants, but also to highly skilled migrants who speak the same first language and have the same skin colour as the majority of the host population.

Do Italians Really Do It Better? Evidence of Migrant Pay Disparities in the Top Italian Football League

“…For example, Oikelome and Healy's () study on domestic‐qualified and overseas‐qualified doctors in the UK found that, although overseas‐qualified doctors earned more than their domestic counterparts, they also worked longer hours and had lesser autonomy and lower levels of morale. Similar mixed evidence was also indicated by Harvey (), who studied British migrants in Vancouver and found that while some had positive experiences, including better salaries, others reported negative experiences. It was also found in some contexts that while migrants did not face barriers in low‐wage jobs, they did so in high‐wage positions (Skuterud and Su, ).…”

Negotiating Employability: Migrant Capitals and Networking Strategies for Zimbabwean Highly Skilled Migrants in the UK

“…A particularly relevant body of literature for our present purpose is the one looking at the role of social capital in migration and settlement. Within migration studies, the notion of social capital has been widely deployed to explain the critical role that kinship and friendship networks play in facilitating migratory processes as new migrants often move to destinations where there is an already existing concentration of compatriots and/or established ethnic communities (eg Reynolds, 2010; Harvey, 2008, 2012; Haug, 2008; Boyd, 1989). Migrant social networks contribute to the decision to migrate by providing information about job opportunities, and support the mobility process through providing resources and facilitating new migrants' integration into the destination society (Portes, 1998; Eve, 2010).…”

Work experiences of qualified immigrants: a review of theoretical progress

“…Their cost-benefit perspective tends to overlook the importance of social networks and structural challenges (Harvey, 2012). For instance, suggest that QIs' career success and satisfaction in host economies is strongly influenced by their ethnic origin.…”