1991
DOI: 10.1080/19187033.1991.11675462
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Labour Mobilization and the Strength of Capital: The Rise and Stall of Economic Democracy in Sweden

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Considering the unique condition of Korea where the national defense budget is large, we included the proportion of the national defense budget to the total GDP (MIL) to test the argument that the size of the budget for national defense has a negative effect on welfare spending (Kim & Seong, ). Lastly, we incorporated the theory on globalization and welfare state change (Cameron, ; Olsen, ). Therefore, OPEN, the percentage of total net value of import and export to GDP, and DINVOC, which is the percentage of direct investment to GDP, were included.…”
Section: Methods and Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering the unique condition of Korea where the national defense budget is large, we included the proportion of the national defense budget to the total GDP (MIL) to test the argument that the size of the budget for national defense has a negative effect on welfare spending (Kim & Seong, ). Lastly, we incorporated the theory on globalization and welfare state change (Cameron, ; Olsen, ). Therefore, OPEN, the percentage of total net value of import and export to GDP, and DINVOC, which is the percentage of direct investment to GDP, were included.…”
Section: Methods and Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By the 1980s, however, the balance of power had shifted decisively in favor of capital, and when it ended centralized, coordinated bargaining in favor of industry-level and local-level negotiations, the LO lost its strategic position. Throughout the 1980s and 1990s, many of Sweden's largest and more internationally-oriented corporations became much less amenable to many aspects of the Swedish model, including the welfare state, corporatist bodies and arrangements, and even the central Swedish Employers Federation (SAF), which it had largely outgrown (1,40,41). No longer engaged in bargaining, the SAF soon reinvented itself as the central propaganda organization for neoliberalism in Sweden.…”
Section: Situational Power: the 'Power Resources' Of Actorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Globalisation is another suggested factor in development of welfare programmes. One stream of studies emphasised the ‘race to the bottom’ of social policy in the effort to attract foreign investment (Hirst & Thompson, ) and welfare retrenchment associated with the weakening role of labour unions (Huber & Stephens, ; Olsen, ). These studies held that globalisation has a negative effect on welfare state expansion, including family policy.…”
Section: Determinants Of Family Policy Spendingmentioning
confidence: 99%