1997
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-349-25397-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Labour’s Renewal?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Following the 1987 general election defeat, moreover, the party leadership undertook a concerted effort to downscale policy ambitions with regard to the interventionist and redistributive aims of the party's economic policy. Thus, in launching the policy review process, comprising seven policy review groups, the party leadership (and particularly the leadership office) took a firm hand in steering the party towards embracing much of the neo-liberal critique of 'traditional' social democracy, particularly the view that the market was a better allocator of resources than the state (Taylor 1997;Motta and Bailey 2007, 123). For instance, in the 1990 policy review document, Looking to the Future, the party stated: 'We welcome and endorse the efficiency and realism which markets can provide' (Labour Party 1990, 6).…”
Section: Transitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following the 1987 general election defeat, moreover, the party leadership undertook a concerted effort to downscale policy ambitions with regard to the interventionist and redistributive aims of the party's economic policy. Thus, in launching the policy review process, comprising seven policy review groups, the party leadership (and particularly the leadership office) took a firm hand in steering the party towards embracing much of the neo-liberal critique of 'traditional' social democracy, particularly the view that the market was a better allocator of resources than the state (Taylor 1997;Motta and Bailey 2007, 123). For instance, in the 1990 policy review document, Looking to the Future, the party stated: 'We welcome and endorse the efficiency and realism which markets can provide' (Labour Party 1990, 6).…”
Section: Transitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is not clear how 'opportunities' are to be redistributed (see Taylor, 1997;Lister, 1997;White, 1998). Moreover, New Labour's 'genuine' or 'real' equality of opportunity may exist in a different context of carrots and sticks and may be continual rather than 'once off ', but does not appear to be significantly different from the conception that was savagely attacked by Tawney (1964) as 'The Tadpole Society'.…”
Section: Investor's Britainmentioning
confidence: 99%