2019
DOI: 10.2478/ngoe-2019-0010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Labour Supply and Inequality Effects of In-Work Benefits: Evidence from Serbia

Abstract: Low labour market participation, together with the high effective tax wedge at low wage levels, create a fertile ground for the introduction of the in-work benefits (IWB) in Serbia. Our paper provides an ex-ante evaluation of the two IWB schemes, directed at stimulating the labour supply and more equal income distribution. The methodological approach combines the tax-and-benefit microsimulation model with the discrete labour supply model. Our results show that both individual and family-based IWB schemes would… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This understanding of the problem is not without support in literature. Ranđelović et al (2019) state that persons from low-income areas, such as the Region of Southern and Eastern Serbia, are to some extent forced to form the labour supply of that region (p. 15). On the other hand, women's participation in earning an income tends to remove the pressure of being the only contributors to the family budget from their husbands (Saikia & Mazumder, 2015).…”
Section: Discussion and Practical Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This understanding of the problem is not without support in literature. Ranđelović et al (2019) state that persons from low-income areas, such as the Region of Southern and Eastern Serbia, are to some extent forced to form the labour supply of that region (p. 15). On the other hand, women's participation in earning an income tends to remove the pressure of being the only contributors to the family budget from their husbands (Saikia & Mazumder, 2015).…”
Section: Discussion and Practical Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ayala and Paniagua (2018) simulations suggest that IWBs would increase female participation in Spain as well. In the Western Balkan context, the studies of Mojsoska Blazevski et al (2015) and Ranđelović et al (2013) indicate potentially favourable employment effects of IWBs in Macedonia and Serbia, respectively. Both studies show that individualbased IWBs are more effective in incentivising potential second earners.…”
Section: In-work Benefits As Make-work-pay Instrumentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reasons are partly structural in nature, and the design of the tax-benefit system and the work (dis)incentives it embodies might be among them. The previous literature on some south and south-east European countries has shown that there is a potential for in-work benefits to improve incentives for employment (Figari, 2010;Figari, 2015;Luca et al, 2014;Ayala and Paniagua, 2018;Ranđelović et al, 2013;Mojsoska Blazevski et al, 2015), and we assess this potential in Croatia. Focusing on couples, we find that while both benefits redistribute towards low-income households, only the one that is income-tested at the individual level increases the probability of participation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…mogu uskladiti privatni 26 i poslovni život u boljoj meri, studirati i raditi u isto vreme, ali i podstaknuti oni koji ne mogu da rade puno radno vreme da rade određeni broj sati i ostvare određeni dohodak. Međutim, broj lica koja rade na nepuno radno vreme u Republici Srbiji je izrazito nizak u poređenju sa prosekom u zemljama EU (18,5%) 31 i iznosi 4,8% među ženama i 3,1% među muškarcima.…”
unclassified