Labour supply in Italy: an empirical analysis of joint household decisions, with taxes and quantity constraints

Aaberge, Rolf; Colombino, Ugo; Strøm, Steinar

doi:10.1002/(sici)1099-1255(199907/08)14:4<403::aid-jae520>3.0.co;2-4

Cited by 162 publications

(212 citation statements)

References 18 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

202

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Furthermore, they crucially a¤ect the optimal design of tax systems (see, e.g., Saez (2001), Immervoll et al (2007) and Blundell et al (2009)). The elasticities are usually derived using some sort of (structural or reduced form) labor supply model (see, e.g., Aaberge et al (1995Aaberge et al ( , 1999Aaberge et al ( , 2000, Hoynes (1996), Eissa and Hoynes (2004) and Heim (2007Heim ( , 2009). All these studies have in common that they focus only on the supply side implicitly assuming perfectly elastic labor demand.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Accounting for labor demand effects in structural labor supply models

Peichl

Siegloch

2012

Labour Economics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. www.econstor.eu The Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA) in Bonn is a local and virtual international research center and a place of communication between science, politics and business. IZA is an independent nonprofit organization supported by Deutsche Post Foundation. The center is associated with the University of Bonn and offers a stimulating research environment through its international network, workshops and conferences, data service, project support, research visits and doctoral program. IZA engages in (i) original and internationally competitive research in all fields of labor economics, (ii) development of policy concepts, and (iii) dissemination of research results and concepts to the interested public. Terms of use: Documents in D I S C U S S I O N P A P E R S E R I E SIZA Discussion Papers often represent preliminary work and are circulated to encourage discussion. Citation of such a paper should account for its provisional character. A revised version may be available directly from the author.IZA Discussion Paper No. 5350 November 2010 ABSTRACT Accounting for Labor Demand Effects in Structural Labor Supply Models *When assessing the effects of policy reforms on the labor market, most studies only focus on labor supply. The interaction of supply and demand side is not explicitly modeled, which might lead to biased estimates of potential labor market outcomes. This paper proposes a straightforward method to remedy this shortcoming. We use information on firms' labor demand behavior and feed them into a structural labor supply model, completing the partial analysis of the labor market on the microdata level. We show the performance and relevance of our extension by introducing a pure labor supply side reform, the workfare concept, in Germany and simulating the labor market outcome of the reform. We find that demand effects offset about 25 percent of the positive labor supply effect of the policy reform.JEL Classification: J22, J23, J68

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Accounting for labor demand effects in structural labor supply models

Peichl

Siegloch

2012

Labour Economics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…This is true both at the cross-country level (see e.g. Bassanini andDuval, 2006, Jaumotte, 2003), but also, as mentioned in the previous section, in the microeconomic literature (Aaberge et al 1999, Arrufat and Zabalza, 1986, Pencavel, 1998, Brewer and Browne, 2006Aaberge et al 1999, Ransom, 1987, for men).…”

mentioning

confidence: 61%

“…For empirical evidence on this, see Mroz (1987), Arrufat and Zabalza (1986) and Aaberge et al (1999).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Aaberge et al (1999) estimate a joint labour supply model with Italian data and find important cross elasticities of women's labour supply with respect to spouse's wage, in particular for the participation decision. This effect, combines with the rather inelastic labour supply among men and individuals with middle and high incomes, causes policy simulations to deliver a moderate aggregate impact on total labour supply.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Explaining Differences in Hours Worked among OECD Countries

Causa

2008

OECD Economics Department Working Papers

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

JT03242014This working paper investigates the policy determinants of hours worked among employed individuals in OECD countries, focussing on the impact of taxation, working-time regulations, and other labour and product market policies. It explores the factors underlying cross-country differences in hours worked -in line with previous aggregate approaches -while at the same time it looks more closely at labour force heterogeneity -in the vein of microeconomic labour supply models. The paper shows that policies and institutions have a different impact on working hours of men and women. Firstly, while high marginal taxes create a disincentive to work longer hours for women, their impact on hours worked by men is almost insignificant. Secondly, working-time regulations have a significant impact on hours worked by men, and this impact differs across education categories. Thirdly, other labour and product market policies, in particular stringent employment protection of workers on regular contracts and competition-restraining product market policies, have a negative impact on hours worked by men, over and beyond their impact on employment levels.

show abstract

“…Other papers rely on more sophisticated measures of well-being, such as the equivalent income, but they just consider the underlying preferences of a reference household so that heterogeneity in preferences is assumed away. See, for example, King (1983) and, more recently, Aaberge et al (2004) and Aaberge and Colombino (2013).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A welfare evaluation of the 1986 tax reform for married couples in the United States

Picchio

Valletta

2017

Int Tax Public Finance

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. The Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA) in Bonn is a local and virtual international research center and a place of communication between science, politics and business. IZA is an independent nonprofit organization supported by Deutsche Post Foundation. The center is associated with the University of Bonn and offers a stimulating research environment through its international network, workshops and conferences, data service, project support, research visits and doctoral program. IZA engages in (i) original and internationally competitive research in all fields of labor economics, (ii) development of policy concepts, and (iii) dissemination of research results and concepts to the interested public. Terms of use: Documents in D I S C U S S I O N P A P E R S E R I E SIZA Discussion Papers often represent preliminary work and are circulated to encourage discussion. Citation of such a paper should account for its provisional character. A revised version may be available directly from the author. We propose an evaluation of the impact of TRA86 on well-being using different welfare metrics which fully retain preference heterogeneity. We estimate utility functions with preference heterogeneity on the basis of structural models of family labor supply. Then, by way of these estimated preferences, we compute several welfare rankings corresponding to different ethical priors. Finally, we identify the losers and the winners of TRA86 under different ethical priors.JEL Classification: C25, D63, H22, H31, J22

show abstract

Labour supply in Italy: an empirical analysis of joint household decisions, with taxes and quantity constraints

Cited by 162 publications

References 18 publications

Accounting for labor demand effects in structural labor supply models

Accounting for labor demand effects in structural labor supply models

Explaining Differences in Hours Worked among OECD Countries

A welfare evaluation of the 1986 tax reform for married couples in the United States

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About