“…More realistically, any modern editor may choose among one of those approaches depending on his/her material and circumstances. Nevertheless, the argument has ever since stimulated much research repeatedly including mathematical argumentation, see for instance, Greg (1931), Maas (1937), Fourquet (1946), Whitehead (1951), Pasquali (1952), Castellani (1957, Hering (1967), Kleinlogel (1968), Weitzman (1982), Weitzman (1987), Grier (1989), Haugen (2002), Timpanaro (2005), Haugen (2010), Haugen (2015), Hoenen (2016). Maas argued that the number of stemmata with a root bifurcation among all possible stemmata which can be reconstructed (thus regarding stemma generation apriori as a random process) would be naturally high.…”