2017
DOI: 10.1038/bmt.2017.204
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lack of association between relationship status and clinical outcome in allogeneic stem cell transplantation—the Swiss Transplant Cohort Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Over the last half-century, numerous studies from different disciplines have investigated relations between marital status and various aspects of health, including cardiovascular, immune, psychiatric and behavioral-related indices [2]. However, findings on the relationship between marital status and health or mortality have been inconsistent [3]. A number of studies conducted on samples from various ethnic groups have reported that rate of all-cause and cause-specific mortality are higher among those who are unmarried, relative to their married counterparts, a relationship which is independent of various sociodemographic characteristics [4, 5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the last half-century, numerous studies from different disciplines have investigated relations between marital status and various aspects of health, including cardiovascular, immune, psychiatric and behavioral-related indices [2]. However, findings on the relationship between marital status and health or mortality have been inconsistent [3]. A number of studies conducted on samples from various ethnic groups have reported that rate of all-cause and cause-specific mortality are higher among those who are unmarried, relative to their married counterparts, a relationship which is independent of various sociodemographic characteristics [4, 5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our findings suggest that lay caregivers and healthcare providers each serve the patients in different ways. Moreover, the different sources and networks of social support in Study 2 (see Figure 1) suggest that information on marital status misses the contribution of other lay caregivers, which may explain why these studies found no link between marital status and survival (Gerull et al, 2017;Sato et al, 2018;Tay et al, 2020). More nuanced measures of support than marital status should be considered for future research.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Three additional studies that used marital status as a support indicator failed to find a link with survival in large samples of patients after alloHCT (N = 10,226, Tay et al, 2020;N = 715, Gerull et al, 2017;N = 309;Sato et al, 2018). However, two of these studies still found some evidence that social support could matter for survival: Tay et al (2020) found an association for graft-versus-host disease (GvHD), while Gerull et al (2017) found that patients with missing information on marital status had worse survival than those with available information.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to studies in general oncology and specific malignancies, two published studies have assessed marital status with respect to hct outcomes, and both demonstrated the lack of an association. Gerull et al 5 examined 715 patients who received allogeneic hct between 2009 and February 2015 in the Swiss Transplant Cohort Study. The authors classified marital status as either single (encompassing single, divorced or separated, and widowed) or in a stable partnership.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interest has been increasing in evaluating the potential impact of psychosocial variables-for example, marital status-on hct outcomes. The results of observational single-centre and registry studies evaluating the association between marital status and outcomes of hematologic malignancies, including hct outcomes, have been inconsistent [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%