1998
DOI: 10.1007/s002280050523
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lack of bioequivalence of a generic mefloquine tablet with the standard product

Abstract: The observed differences in Cmax, tmax and AUC are consistent with a slower rate and lower extent of mefloquine absorption after administration of M1. Statistical evaluation of these kinetic data showed that the M1 tablet is not bioequivalent to the M2 tablet. Clinical consequences of this finding cannot be excluded.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
25
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
2
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Direct comparison of these results with those from previous studies should also take into account that a different formulation of the drug was used. Previous studies have shown that the different products are not bioequivalent (10,18). Tolerability of this three-dose mefloquine regimen was good.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Direct comparison of these results with those from previous studies should also take into account that a different formulation of the drug was used. Previous studies have shown that the different products are not bioequivalent (10,18). Tolerability of this three-dose mefloquine regimen was good.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…The affinity of (+)-mefloquine for the [ 125 I]DOI binding site of recombinant h5-HT 2A receptors is similar to the affinity of DMT (Ki = 210 nM), a psychotomimetic, but DMT and mefloquine have much lower affinity than LSD and DOM at this receptor (Table 1). The K i value for mefloquine (341 nM), is below the minimum anti-plasmodial therapeutic concentration of the drug in blood (1.6 μM; see Schlagenhauf et al, 2011; C max = 1018 μg/L ≈ 2.6 μM, but varies by preparation, see Wiedekam et al, 1998). However, free concentrations of mefloquine in brain would be much smaller, as indicated above.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…12 Different commercial preparations of MQ are known to vary in terms of their bioavailability. 13 A recent study in Thailand comparing Lariam ® (F. Hoffmann La Roche, Basel, Switzerland) with two other commercial preparations, Mephaquin ® and Eloquine ® (Medochemie, Ltd., Limassol, Cyprus) showed that blood levels and the area under the curve with Mephaquin ® were 50% lower that those with Lariam ® .…”
Section: Figure 2 Geometric Mean Parasite Density Of Patients Treatementioning
confidence: 99%