1996
DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1996.tb03585.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lack of Calling Song Displacement Between Two Closely Related Ground Crickets

Abstract: Thorough examinations of purported cases of reproductive character displacement are critical for reaching an understanding of the role of reinforcement in the evolution of reproductive barriers between closely related species. In this paper, we report the results of an extensive investigation of male calling song variation in the ground crickets, Allonemobius fasciatus and A. socius. Contrary to the results of an earlier study, we uncovered little evidence of displacement of songs in areas of overlap. We discu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

2
7
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
2
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The importance of reinforcement and reproductive character displacement has been controversial because of theoretical difficulties (Felsenstein, 1981;Paterson, 1982;Barton & Hewitt, 1985;Spencer et al, 1986;Butlin, 1989) and lack of empirical evidence (Walker, 1974a;Veech et al, 1996). However, recent theoretical developments using genetic models suggest that reproductive character displacement could occur under a wide variety of conditions (Liou & Price, 1994;Kelly & Noor, 1996;Servedio & Kirkpatrick, 1997;Kirkpatrick & Servedio, 1999;Kirkpatrick, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The importance of reinforcement and reproductive character displacement has been controversial because of theoretical difficulties (Felsenstein, 1981;Paterson, 1982;Barton & Hewitt, 1985;Spencer et al, 1986;Butlin, 1989) and lack of empirical evidence (Walker, 1974a;Veech et al, 1996). However, recent theoretical developments using genetic models suggest that reproductive character displacement could occur under a wide variety of conditions (Liou & Price, 1994;Kelly & Noor, 1996;Servedio & Kirkpatrick, 1997;Kirkpatrick & Servedio, 1999;Kirkpatrick, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After extensive study (Howard and Furth 1986;Benedix and Howard 1991;Gregory and Howard 1993;Doherty and Howard 1996;Veech et al 1996), the only factor we have been able to identify that isolates the two species is conspecific sperm precedence Gregory and Howard 1994). Although females of both species paired exclusively with heterospecific males produce fertile hybrid offspring , when females of both species are mated to a conspecific male and a heterospecific male, heterospecific sperm rarely fertilize eggs Gregory and Howard 1994).…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…components were not statistically independent, a multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) was performed to test for variation in calling song (Table 1). The largest contributor to variation in calling song came from species-level effects (F = 160, P < 0.0001), followed by differences between field-collected and laboratory-reared crickets (F = 39, P < Benedix and Howard (1991), Olvido and Mousseau (1995), and Veech et al (1996). Overall, all calling-song characters varied significantly among populations and wild-caught versus laboratory-reared crickets, suggesting the importance of both genetic and environmental factors for variation in calling song.…”
Section: Laboratory Rearing and Pedigree Generationmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The discovery of male calling-song differences between the two taxa (Howard and Furth 1986), as well as evidence of character displacement in song in areas of sympatry (Benedix and Howard 1991) focused our attention on male calling songs and led to more detailed studies of geographic and temporal variation in song (Veech et al 1996). Recent studies of female phonotaxis in these crickets (e.g., Doherty and Howard 1996) suggest that variation in male calling song is not the predominant mechanism for the reproductive isolation currently observed between the two cricket species.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%