2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2018.01.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lack of effect of a topical regenerative agent on re-epithelialization rate of canine spontaneous chronic corneal epithelial defects: A randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled study

Abstract: Spontaneous chronic corneal epithelial defects (SCCEDs) are characteristic ulcers in dogs that are refractory to healing. The aim of the study was to evaluate the use of a topical regenerative agent to promote healing of SCCEDs. Nineteen dogs (20 eyes) were randomized to receive either regenerative agent (10 eyes) or placebo (10 eyes) every 48h following corneal debridement, which was repeated 1 week later if the SCCED had not yet healed. The mean±standard deviation time to re-epithelialization was 17.3±12.8 d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, the Clerapliq ® treatment used in these case reports did not result in any local or systemic side effects in treated dogs. This is in accordance with the safety data obtained from more than thousands of dogs and cats treated by Clerapliq ® in Europe (TVM) and with the publications on Clerapliq ® [36]. Also, as mentioned in the introduction, the equivalent of Cleraplic ® in humans is called Cacicol ® , which is a medical device that has been successfully used for more than 50,000 patients with no reported local or systemic side effects [37][38][39].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Finally, the Clerapliq ® treatment used in these case reports did not result in any local or systemic side effects in treated dogs. This is in accordance with the safety data obtained from more than thousands of dogs and cats treated by Clerapliq ® in Europe (TVM) and with the publications on Clerapliq ® [36]. Also, as mentioned in the introduction, the equivalent of Cleraplic ® in humans is called Cacicol ® , which is a medical device that has been successfully used for more than 50,000 patients with no reported local or systemic side effects [37][38][39].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…In a recent publication, OTR4120 was found to be no more effective than hyaluronic acid, considered as a placebo, for healing SCCED [36]. We believe that hand removal of the hyaline acellular zone in the anterior corneal stroma may be difficult to fully achieve, and for this reason, diamond burr is preferred.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In rabbits it facilitated cornea healing after alkali injuring [11]. Other studies showed no change in healing time in humans [2], rabbits [30], and dogs [28], which is in accordance with our results. Corneal epithelialisation was neither promoted nor impaired.…”
Section: Rgtasupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The improvement in healing times with the use of topically applied regenerating agents (RGTAs) has been evaluated in several species such as humans, dogs, and rabbits and showed conflicting results [ [30]. By replacing and mimicking degraded heparin-sulfate, which is bound to extracellular matrix proteins thus protecting them from proteolysis, RGTAs stimulate the regeneration process [18] [28]. By the time the analysis of this study was finished, their effectiveness had not been evaluated in equine patients before.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As with all diseases, for ulcerative keratitis, it is necessary to have an assessment system that best reflects the clinical and epidemiological characteristics of dogs affected by different environmental factors. Although various studies exist on corneal ulcers 13,14 , no studies have used deep learning and/or other technical algorithms to assist in diagnosing such ulcers. Therefore, this study uses a CNN to determine the severity of corneal ulcers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%