Lay Abstract
A diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder currently requires an individual to have symptoms in two core areas, i.e., difficulties in social communication, and a restricted, repetitive pattern of behavior and interests. A screening tool for autism should reflect these two diagnostic criteria in order to provide a valid way for assessing behaviors related to autism. However, since most autism measurement tools were developed for use with children and adolescents, we do not know as much about the applicability of the measurement tools to adults. The present study evaluated the validity of a commonly used measure for autism symptom severity (i.e., Social Responsiveness Scale, SRS). We examined the relationships between the SRS factors (which were consistent with two core symptom areas) and other measures related to autism in adulthood, using data from 237 adults with autism spectrum disorders. Findings showed that the SRS factors were predictive of autism symptoms and behavioral measures. Results also demonstrated that SRS factors were differentially related to measures specific to social or behavioral domains. These results highlighted the importance of taking the two core symptoms into account at the same time to enhance our understanding of autism symptomatology in adulthood.
Scientific Abstract
The Social Responsiveness Scale (SRS; Constantino & Gruber, 2005) is a widely-used measure of autism symptoms, but its application for the study of adults with autism spectrum disorders has not been fully evaluated. Using a factor structure consistent with DSM-V criteria for autism spectrum disorder (Frazier et al., 2014), the primary purpose of the current study was to establish the validity of the SRS with a sample of adults with autism spectrum disorder (N = 237). Correlational analyses indicated that SRS factors were highly associated with autism symptoms and behavioral measures, indicating concurrent and predictive validity. Multiple regression results demonstrated that SRS factors were differentially related to measures specific to social or behavioral domains, indicating convergent and discriminant validity. Implications for future research are discussed.