1983
DOI: 10.1097/00000421-198306000-00013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lack of potentiation of vincristine-induced neurotoxicity by VP-16–213

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A mild peripheral neuropathy was reported in 1-20% of patients receiving etoposide alone (1,4,8,18), although this finding has been challenged by others (14). The possible enhancement of vincristine-induced peripheral neuropathy by etoposide has also been questioned (12,25). A single case of etoposideinduced central nervous system toxicity, character-ized by acute dystonia, an extrapyramidal side effect, has also been reported (2).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A mild peripheral neuropathy was reported in 1-20% of patients receiving etoposide alone (1,4,8,18), although this finding has been challenged by others (14). The possible enhancement of vincristine-induced peripheral neuropathy by etoposide has also been questioned (12,25). A single case of etoposideinduced central nervous system toxicity, character-ized by acute dystonia, an extrapyramidal side effect, has also been reported (2).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In one series in which patients with recurrent malignant brain tumors who had progressed after receiving BCNU and Vincristine were treated with standard doses of VP-16, 17% were noted to have responses and 34% had stable disease [2]. Recent data have demonstrated synergistic antitumor activity between Vincristine and VP-16 [3] without added toxicity [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%