2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2020.108865
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lack of protection against feline immunodeficiency virus infection among domestic cats in New Zealand vaccinated with the Fel-O-Vax® FIV vaccine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recombinant subtype viruses exist (e.g., A/B, A/C, etc.) and have been reported in the field 6, 7, 9–11 …”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 93%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Recombinant subtype viruses exist (e.g., A/B, A/C, etc.) and have been reported in the field 6, 7, 9–11 …”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 93%
“…A NZ field study recently reported no protection from FIV infection in FIV-vaccinated cats. 11 The definition for FIV-positivity was more relaxed in the NZ study and there were biases with case recruitment that impacted study results. For example, the rate of FIV infection in controls was half that of vaccinates, suggesting differences between the recruited groups.…”
Section: Fiv Vaccinationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Similarly, in a study investigating the efficacy of a canarypox virus-vectored FeLV vaccine (Purevax ® FeLV, Merial), no difference in vaccine efficacy was observed, whether the FeLV component was administered as a monovalent or polyvalent vaccine [58]. Field-based vaccine efficacy studies for all FeLV vaccines are required to determine vaccine performance under natural challenge conditions and in different jurisdictions where different FeLV strains are circulating, similar to studies testing the efficacy of Fel-O-Vax ® FIV in the field [14,59].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%