1978
DOI: 10.1182/blood.v51.3.475.bloodjournal513475
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lack of protective effect of autotransplanted splenic tissue to pneumococcal challenge

Abstract: Studies in animals and clinical experience in patients have demonstrated that splenectomy may lead to an increased susceptibility to infection. The infections are usually caused by encapsulated bacteria such as penumococcus. It has been shown in a variety of experimental animals that autotransplanted splenic tissue is capable of regenerating into implants that are microscopically indistinguishable from normal spleen and of restoring a number of normal splenic functions. The response to intravenous challenge wi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
11
0
1

Year Published

1979
1979
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Loss of the spleen carries a risk of overwhelming postsplenectomy infection by encapsulated bacteria (Llende, 1986). Splenules in the rat either failed to pro- tect (Schwartz et al, 1978;Scher et al, 19851, or only partially protected (Livingston et al, 1983a;Moxon and Schwartz, 19801, against bacterial infection. The quantity of splenic tissue necessary to attain normal splenic function has been studied in animals with splenules.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Loss of the spleen carries a risk of overwhelming postsplenectomy infection by encapsulated bacteria (Llende, 1986). Splenules in the rat either failed to pro- tect (Schwartz et al, 1978;Scher et al, 19851, or only partially protected (Livingston et al, 1983a;Moxon and Schwartz, 19801, against bacterial infection. The quantity of splenic tissue necessary to attain normal splenic function has been studied in animals with splenules.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In animal models, splenic tissue implants can restore some immunological activities (Likhite, 1975) and in man inadvertently autotransplanted tissue may function (Mazur, Field, Cahow, Schiffman, Duffy & Forget, 1978) and be responsible for the low incidence of infection after trauma. However, autotransplanted splenic tissue does not protect from pneumococcal challenge in rats (Schwartz, Goldthorn, Winkelstein & Swift, 1978).…”
Section: Possibility Of Autotransplantationmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Experimental studies investigating the immunoprotector effect of autogenous splenic implants are based on animal exposure to several bacterial species, with evaluation of the following factors: bacterial clearance from the bloodstream (Patel et al, 1986;Cooney et al, 1979;Brown et al, 1981;Malangoni et al, 1988), mortality due to the sepsis caused by the microorganisms (Cooney et al, 1979;Schwartz et al, 1978;Livingston et al, 1982;Malangoni et al, 1985), as well as the potential benefits of immunization combined with splenic autotransplantation (Leemans et al, 1999;Cooney et al, 1979).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%