1966
DOI: 10.1016/0042-6822(66)90282-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lack of relationship between infection with avian leukosis virus and the presence of COFAL antigen in chick embryos

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
36
0

Year Published

1967
1967
1986
1986

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although it is usually assumed that these antigens are coded for in the genome of the virus, alternative explanations may exist. For instance, it has been suggested that the common complement-fixing antigen of the avian leucosis group of viruses could be a normal chick component (34).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although it is usually assumed that these antigens are coded for in the genome of the virus, alternative explanations may exist. For instance, it has been suggested that the common complement-fixing antigen of the avian leucosis group of viruses could be a normal chick component (34).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(i) The presence of an antigen that crossreacts with antibody against the ALV group-specific antigen (13); (ii) the synthesis of a small number of apparently noninfectious C-type virions in the pancreas and liver of leukosis-free embryos (15) and in the pancreas and ovary of healthy adult hens (16); (iii) the helper function without which RSV(0) cannot replicate (13); (iv) the production of RAV (Rous-associated virus)-60 that is induced by infection with RSV (17), and probably by the same mechanism, the often noted. contamination of pure ALV stocks by other leukosis viruses; (v) by Dr. R. Friis (0 = no gs-antigen detected).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A major consideration in our studies was the possibility that the immunity was provided by MuLV antigen in the fetal cell preparations rather than by a cross-reactive embryonic specific antigen. This is especially true since antigen similar to the gs antigen of avian leukosis virus has been found in virusfree chicken embryo cells (22 (19) have found that all naturally occurring MuLV isolated from BALB/c and other mouse strains are of the Gross or AKR virus serotype. Thus, any virus present in the embryo cell preparations of our study probably has no neutralizing or cross-reacting activity with the RLV since it is of the FMR serotype.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The recovery of spleen cells of mice infected with RLV for 22 and 28 days was markedly depressed (approx. 60 and 49% of normal) when the cells were implanted in embryo-primed recipients.…”
Section: Hemolytic Plaque-forming Cellsmentioning
confidence: 99%