2007
DOI: 10.1002/humu.20587
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lack ofSSH1 mutations in Dutch patients with disseminated superficial actinic porokeratosis: is there really an association?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
5
1
Order By: Relevance
“…1). Accordingly, the SSH1 mutation was absolutely not a polymorphism as Frank et al [2007] pointed out, but definitely a true mutation strongly associated with DSAP in this family. Therefore, we reported the aforementioned research results in Human Mutation in 2004 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 52%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…1). Accordingly, the SSH1 mutation was absolutely not a polymorphism as Frank et al [2007] pointed out, but definitely a true mutation strongly associated with DSAP in this family. Therefore, we reported the aforementioned research results in Human Mutation in 2004 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 52%
“…We appreciated that Frank et al [2007] were interested in our research and commented on our article published in Human Mutation in 2004 and in the Journal of Investigative Dermatology in 2007 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Its molecular basis is so far unknown, although three different genetic loci and diverse candidate genes have been proposed [2, 3]. However, these data could not be reproduced by other groups so far and require further confirmation [4, 5]. Except for sun exposure, several risk factors have been associated with the development of DSAP, including virus infection, immunosuppression and radioactivity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Certain mutations that are associated with porokeratosis, including frameshift mutations, have been identified (2,3). However, these events are confined to certain pedigrees (4). Clinical and molecular evidence has demonstrated that porokeratosis can be considered to be a premalignant skin condition (5,6).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%