2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0161-6420(01)00596-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lacrimal sac dacryoliths11The authors have no financial interest in the materials mentioned in this article.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
25
0
9

Year Published

2004
2004
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
25
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…Dacryoliths have been reported in between 6% and 18% of dacryocystitis cases. [2,6,12–15] Ellis et al thought that the finding of concretions was diagnostic, and Pavilack and Frueh [3] established the diagnosis of chronic canaliculitis by the presence of expressible canalicular concretions. Lee et al also thought that concretions extruding from the punctum were an important characteristic and a sign for diagnosis with canaliculitis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dacryoliths have been reported in between 6% and 18% of dacryocystitis cases. [2,6,12–15] Ellis et al thought that the finding of concretions was diagnostic, and Pavilack and Frueh [3] established the diagnosis of chronic canaliculitis by the presence of expressible canalicular concretions. Lee et al also thought that concretions extruding from the punctum were an important characteristic and a sign for diagnosis with canaliculitis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several predisposing factors of dacryolith formation have been suggested. A previous study reported an association between lacrimal sac dacryoliths and the following clinical findings: intermittent or constant epiphora, mucoid discharge, acute lacrimal sac distention, a partial obstruction, recurrent acute dacryocystitis, and cigarette smoking [1]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction is more common in females than males, resulting in the speculation that the obstruction is caused by gender-specific hormonal or anatomic differences. However, it was not possible to demonstrate a gender bias toward dacryolithiasis [2], with neither a female propensity reported by Hawes [3]nor a male preponderance reported by Yazici et al [1]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some authors have suggested that cigarette smoking, facial-sinonasal trauma and a history of dacryocystitis may be predisposing factors of PANDO [4]. Some authors have suggested a vicious circle scenario, where certain etiological factors provide reinforcement for other ones.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction (PANDO) is idiopathic and occurs more frequently in women (50–83%) than in men [1,4]. One of the proposed etiological factors is a small diameter of the bony canal through which the nasolacrimal duct passes [1].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%