2015
DOI: 10.12982/cmujns.2015.0078
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lactobacillus Enriched Intermediate-Moisture Fruit Products

Abstract: This study evaluated the effect of two fruit sizes (3.5×2.5×1.0 and 1.2×1.2×0.8 cm 3 ) and processing time (impregnation and relaxation times; both for 10 and 20 min), on some vacuum impregnation parameters of cantaloupe and apple. Fruit size and processing time significantly affected the mass fraction of fruit occupied by impregnation liquid (X value) and the effective porosity (ε e ) of apples more than cantaloupe. High surface area of fruit and long processing times allowed for significant liquid penetratio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, at all impregnation conditions, murta was enriched with [ 10 7 CFU/g L. casei (Table 4). These values represent less than 1 log cycle reduction in the initial L. casei content (10 8 CFU/g) from the impregnation solution and are similar to the reduction reported after vacuum impregnation of probiotics in several fruits and vegetables (Betoret et al 2003;Oliveira et al 2017;Noorbakhsh et al 2013;Re ˆgo et al 2013;Wirjantoro et al 2015). The initial counts ranged from 1.46 ± 0.14 9 10 7 to 2.34 ± 0.06 9 10 7 CFU/g in vacuum dried samples and from 1.22 ± 0.09 9 10 7 to 2.53 ± 0.17 9 10 7 CFU/g in samples dried by convective drying (Table 4).…”
Section: Viability Of Probiotic Bacteria In Impregnated-dried Murtasupporting
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In general, at all impregnation conditions, murta was enriched with [ 10 7 CFU/g L. casei (Table 4). These values represent less than 1 log cycle reduction in the initial L. casei content (10 8 CFU/g) from the impregnation solution and are similar to the reduction reported after vacuum impregnation of probiotics in several fruits and vegetables (Betoret et al 2003;Oliveira et al 2017;Noorbakhsh et al 2013;Re ˆgo et al 2013;Wirjantoro et al 2015). The initial counts ranged from 1.46 ± 0.14 9 10 7 to 2.34 ± 0.06 9 10 7 CFU/g in vacuum dried samples and from 1.22 ± 0.09 9 10 7 to 2.53 ± 0.17 9 10 7 CFU/g in samples dried by convective drying (Table 4).…”
Section: Viability Of Probiotic Bacteria In Impregnated-dried Murtasupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Many drying processes have been used to dehydrate food after vacuum impregnation. Among these are hot-air (Betoret et al 2003), vacuum (Wirjantoro et al 2015) and microwave drying (Contreras et al 2005). In addition, spherical shaped foods are commonly dried with fluidized-bed dryers (Poo ´s and Szabo ´2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a study carried out by Wirjantoro et al. (2015), fresh apple and melon pieces with a sucrose solution containing L. acidophilus TISTR 1338 were produced using the VI technique. Then, the samples were stored at +4°C and +30°C for 8 weeks.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%