2003
DOI: 10.1097/00005176-200303000-00017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lactobacillus plantarum Inhibits the Intestinal Epithelial Migration of Neutrophils Induced by Enteropathogenic Escherichia coli

Abstract: These results suggest that L. plantarum is beneficial in inhibiting neutrophil migration induced by EPEC, but only when preincubated with host epithelia. Rather than an indirect effect through a secreted substance produced by the probiotic agent, its effect is direct and requires the presence of the bacterium.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
17
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Dead cells of probiotics exert a number of biological responses during in vitro cell-culture and in vivo animal studies (13). However, several of the effects exerted by live strains on IECs are notably absent with dead cells, such as maintaining barrier function after an enteropathogen insult and colonization resistance after enteropathogen adherence (14,15). Dead cells also fail to prevent against cytokineinduced apoptosis (16) and have shown to have inferior efficacy in clinical trials in reducing translocation (17) compared with live, viable probiotics.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dead cells of probiotics exert a number of biological responses during in vitro cell-culture and in vivo animal studies (13). However, several of the effects exerted by live strains on IECs are notably absent with dead cells, such as maintaining barrier function after an enteropathogen insult and colonization resistance after enteropathogen adherence (14,15). Dead cells also fail to prevent against cytokineinduced apoptosis (16) and have shown to have inferior efficacy in clinical trials in reducing translocation (17) compared with live, viable probiotics.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to the untreated group, E. coli did not negatively influence the permeability of the intestinal cell wall of rats that received L. plantarum (Mangell et al, 2002). Pre-incubation of an intestinal epithelial T-84 monolayer with L. plantarum, showed a reduced attachment of enteropathogenic E. coli and reduction in inflammatory factors, like neutrophil migration (Michail & Abernathy, 2003). However, short-term addition of L. plantarum did not reduce the effect of E. coli in similar experiments on the intestinal cells (Mangell et al, 2002;Michail & Abernathy, 2003).…”
Section: Effects Of L Plantarum On Diseasementioning
confidence: 90%
“…Pre-incubation of an intestinal epithelial T-84 monolayer with L. plantarum, showed a reduced attachment of enteropathogenic E. coli and reduction in inflammatory factors, like neutrophil migration (Michail & Abernathy, 2003). However, short-term addition of L. plantarum did not reduce the effect of E. coli in similar experiments on the intestinal cells (Mangell et al, 2002;Michail & Abernathy, 2003). A possible mechanism is competitive exclusion between L. plantarum and E. coli via the mannose adhesin that can be involved in competition for the mannose-specific binding sites as described earlier (Pretzer et al, 2004).…”
Section: Effects Of L Plantarum On Diseasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…They can exert some of their effects at the mucosal-luminal interface through their actions on intestinal epithelial cells (IECs). Select probiotics can upregulate IEC mucin expression to impede enteropathogen access to IECs [1]; maintain barrier function following enteropathogen insult and reduce enteropathogen colonization and adherence [2,3]; modulate Toll-like receptor 2, critical in maintaining barrier function when cells are faced with inflammatory stress [4]; and prevent apoptosis to enhance survival of mucosal cells to subsequently provide enhanced mucosal barrier function [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%